حمیدرضا حق پناهان

The most essential function of governments, whether theological or secular, as a living organ is to survive in the area under its rule, & the public wealth of each country provides the resources to meet the needs of this living organ. In today's society, the administration of justice in the areas of distribution, allocation & elimination of discrimination is an undeniable necessity for the survival of governments. Indeed, the greater amount of these resources, if properly managed or consumed, it will lead to the growth of sustainable government development & ensure the survival of governance. The first step in managing & exploiting public wealth is to identify all types & instances of public wealth. So far, only the tangible aspects of public wealth have been considered in Iranian public law, & the intangible aspects of public wealth have been neglected due to the lack of recognition of this type of wealth, both in the field of identification & in the field of management or consumption. Human capital as intangible public wealth is the most valuable part of a country's public wealth, which has been considered by governments in macroeconomics since the beginning of the present century. This article seeks to expand the conceptual space of the subject & express its problematic aspect & examine the various dimensions & aspects of public wealth, especially intangible public wealth, & in a word, to substantiate the concept of intangible public wealth.

Today, social capital is a major part of intangible public wealth, and the protection of public wealth requires good governance (as one of the components of soft power), a form of governance largely by the institution. International and developed countries have entered the literature of sustainable development and it has been interpreted as the proper management of a country's resources in a flexible, transparent, responsive, fair and responsive way to the needs of its citizens, which can, while protecting Social capital will increase the level of soft power. Therefore, according to the thematic documents presented in this research, the research method is descriptive-analytical and the data collection method is library. The article raises the question: What is the relationship between good governance (as a component of soft power) and public wealth? In other words, how can good governance affect social capital? In response, it can be assumed that: "The relationship between good governance and social capital is an interactive and two-way relationship in which good governance can create conditions in which social capital flourishes and social capital flourishes. It paves the way for good governance and increases soft power. ”The result is that social capital has positive effects on the dimensions of good governance, including transparency, oversight, balance, democracy and solidarity, and good governance also increases and The level of social capital will rise.