فهرست مطالب علی میر ابراهیمی

As we know, one of the important discussions in the field of substantive and formal law is to examine the dimensions of these rights in the conventions and the law in question. Its social justice is so important that it is at the forefront of basic human rights in all countries. In the Iranian legal system, which is derived from the sacred jurisprudential system, the study of formal and substantive rights has received more and more attention by the legislator, although the constitution has many strong principles in this area. The source of social justice and freedom in Iranian law is mostly human rights documents and in almost all human rights documents, primary and secondary rights have been examined. An important challenge that we have encountered in this study is that although the theory of social justice has been studied theoretically in the relevant laws, but in some cases it is in conflict with the Iranian constitution, which we will address in this dissertation.

One of the issues in law is the issue of social justice. One of the important components of social justice is freedom. Freedom is one of the concepts that in order to understand it, in the beginning, one must understand the opposite concept in order to understand the scope of this concept. When we say freedom, if we do not understand any of the concepts that are placed in front of it, we cannot get the truth and scope of this concept. First we have to consider being bound to a bond, then we have to define the boundaries of that bond, then we imagine the liberation from that bond and put the name of freedom on it, being bound to live in a place, as opposed to freedom and liberation from this bondage is the relative freedom it faces. Being limited in speech or in action or in thought is against freedom, and being free from limitations is freedom. This article examines the components of social justice in the field of freedom.