فهرست مطالب لیلا آقامجیدی

Sharafnameh is an important source in the history of the Kurds and the land of Kurdistan. Wiki is one of the most valuable sources in the study of the local history of Iran and the Ottoman Empire, especially in the tenth century. This work, in addition to narrating events, includes a wealth of information on the style of government, the tax system, the judiciary, and the geographical information of Kurdish sources. Our aim in this research, considering the value of this work and with the intention of recognizing and introducing it further, is to study its structure and content and to show its stylistic components. By describing and analyzing Sharafnameh in three levels: linguistic-structural, literary-artistic, aesthetic and content-intellectual, the author has tried to show the valuable and salient points of the work to the audience.

The research method in this article is descriptive, analytical and the information has been collected by searching library resources. The scope of the study is Sharafnameh book, in which many examples of stylistic and content characteristics based on inductive method have been mentioned.

The findings of the study indicate that Sharafnameh has the same characteristics of historical prose of the Safavid period and is considered as a legacy of the Timurid period, which is influenced by factors such as the spread of the Turkish language as a result of Turkish rulers and rulers and the influence of Shiite scholars in promoting The Arabic language, as well as being influenced by the cultural context of the Kurdish-speaking land, is rich in Turkish, Mongolian, Arabic, and possibly Kurdish or Kurdish-like words.

One of the features of the prose of this book is the artistic use of rhetorical industries in the field of rhetorical and spiritual rhetoric, among which; Prostitution in the realm of novel rhetoric and intensive simile, allusion and irony in the realm of spiritual novelty are the most frequent literary arrays. Sharafnameh intellectually includes features such as; Elitism is a critical Shari"a and at the same time a praiseworthy approach to the Kurds. Other features of the prose of this book are etymology and repetition of synonyms. The author of the book, in the preface and all the chapters of the book, stretches the speech as much as he can with a concise prose, and when his intention is only to mention an event, his words are simply desired. Mirsharafuddin"s pen is fluent and easy to understand, except in rare cases.