فهرست مطالب محسن محرم خانی

The purpose of the present study is to provide models for measuring the dividend bonding phenomenon and its impact on corporate governance mechanisms and life cycles.

In order to achieve the purpose of the study, 119 companies were selected from among the listed companies at Tehran Stock Exchange during 2011-2017 and analyzed by multiple regression method.

The results showed that there is a dividend bonding phenomenon among sample companies. It is also more severe in mature companies than in growth or decline. In addition, the presence of institutional owners and non-executive directors reduces this phenomenon. While the duality of CEO responsibility did not have a significant impact on it.

The findings of the study showed that being or not managing directors has an important role in dividend policy, but the presence of non-executive directors who have good independence and are able to deal with the CEO seriously and the presence of institutional owners The General Assembly has a constructive role in improving dividend policy.

the present study, while examining the phenomenon of dividend adhesion and its impact on corporate governance mechanisms over the lifecycle of companies, has attempted to explain the model of dividend adhesion phenomena that can be addressed by existing data. To increase knowledge. To help shareholders understand the relationship between net profit and dividend.

The purpose of this study was to investigating the relationship between board capital and value creation. Statistical population study is accepted companies at Tehran Stock Exchange. Based on conditions considered for sampling, selected 123 companies by systematically eliminated during the years 1391 to 1395, and after collecting data, test the hypotheses using by multiple regression for panel data. In this study, board capital Was divided human board capital that consists of four components of education, expertise, professional experience (in industry) and prestige, and social board capital that consists of two components of external and internal. Also, use Tobin's Q as An indicator for value creation. The results show that among the components of human board capital, professional experience (in industry) has a positively and significantly relationship, and prestige has negatively and significantly relationship with value creation. In addition, among the components of Social board capital, External Social Capital has negatively and significantly relationship with value creation. There was no significant relationship was observed between human board capital and social board capital with value creation. While, there is positively and significantly relationship between board capital and value creation