مرجان برنجی اردستانی

There are two kinds of penal policies: justice oriented and the other security / enemy oriented penal policy. However the limitation ofindividual responsibilities and not interfering in their private life are fundamental, in some late decades could be said security orientated criminal law formed by more governmental interfere and also expansion of person responsibility albeit authority of security is their excuse but its cost is human rights elimination and feeling of security is not visible. It means this penal policy has not been successful considerably.

There are two types of criminal policies in criminal law, justice oriented criminal policy and security oriented criminal policy. If the principles in justice oriented criminal policy are people limited, non intervention on personal private life, in last decades we can say security oriented criminal policy involved the more government intervention on personal private life and the development of person responsibility. Even though the governing of security despite eliminating of human rights is the approach of security oriented criminal policy, but under protection of this policy, it has not been considered any feeling of security. It means in spite of security essence, we cannot see any feeling of security in societies and this is one of the most important aspects of security oriented criminal policy. In this article with focusing on feeling of non security, we considered different ideas such as: Broken window, Zero tolerance, Violating of fundamental rules governed on criminal law.