بهمن اکبری

Undoubtedly important and essential structures In the transmission of religious, theological and philosophical concepts It is the use of methods and methods that come up with a new and new approach. At In this regard it says interdisciplinary approach & studies In different areas of science; In the field of innovation for the audience and the knowledgeable With too much variety and precision and metering Be accepted. As we know New or symbolic logic One of the ways that was able to translate qualitative language into quantitative language and solved scribbles of natural language. With that in mind; We have tried in the present article With approach Logical analysis and Theological Verse 22 of the prophets On the Unity of God Be noted. In addition to that Intellectual & logical limitations(barriers) The assumption of a multitude of gods With approach Logical and Theological Obtain the proper explanation (unity of God). As will be pointed out Content analysis and structural analysis of the above verse was form of argument and being unequal It shows two propositions(A true example of logical construction and based on the principle Contradiction).

Today, religious experience with its structure, scope and scope is one of the basic topics of the psychology of religion and contemporary philosophy of religion. Thus, the formation of the view of religious experience and the scope of its discussions in the West mainly came about following the challenges of philosophers such as Descartes to Hume and Kant who questioned the theological arguments of Madrasi and expanded with Schleier Macher's thoughts., its function in human life and the essence of religion or its truth or falsity have drawn various opinions in these time periods. Among them, phenomenologists and philosophers of religion have drawn dimensions and characteristics for religion, one of which is the experimental dimension of religion. In the thought of constructivists such as Proudfoot and Katz, who emphasize the mystical dimension of religious experience in explaining it, they believe that the nature of religious experience is influenced by the network of subjective beliefs and concepts of the subject and that experiences are devoid of beliefs and concepts (unlike the approach of essentialists). Does not exist. In the present research, our attempt is to analyze the two mentioned approaches with regard to their structures and compare the differences or commonalities of these two perspectives.

Discussing the scope of religious experience has been one of the most important topics since the eighteenth century, and from that period until now, thinkers in various fields of study such as philosophy of religion, modern theology, theology and psychology of religion and ... Has drawn various opinions in these periods about its nature and nature, the scope of its studies, its function in human life and the essence of religion or its truth or falsity. Among other things, the phenomenologists and philosophers of religion have drawn dimensions and characteristics for religion, one of which is the empirical dimension of religion. Moral, legal, and ideological precepts may contribute to the emergence of certain emotions, such as astonishment, fear, and humility, and give rise to a wonderful and exhilarating experience, such as the presence of God or the transcendent, or the glorification of mystical beings and mystical and inner experiences. Become another, to be "quite distinct" from external experiences. Because people in many different religious traditions claim to experience God, Nirvana, or Brahman, and feel that such experiences give meaning and direction to their lives. It can be acknowledged that religious experience is one of the most important issues in the psychology of religion and the philosophy of religion. In the thought of constructivists such as Pradfoot and Katz, who mostly emphasize the explanation of religious experience in its mystical dimension, they believe that the nature of religious experience is influenced by the network of beliefs and mental concepts of the subject and there are no empty experiences of beliefs and concepts. On the other hand, in Phillips's approach, religious claims, although they do not have a cognitive and narrative aspect, but to explain the statements, one can look at their application in one's social life; In other words, in order to understand religious claims, we must know the areas of life forms and pay attention to the rules of the game of religion, which is a correct belief related to a person's way of life. In the present study, while examining the methodology of these views, we try to explain and examine the views of Katz and Phillips on religious experience.