فهرست مطالب abolfazl jafargholikhani

 Investigations show that the government has long sought to de-judge and internalize the method of quick, specialized, legal and cost-free resolution of disputes of a non-judicial nature between the executive bodies under its management and the internal mechanisms of the executive branch within the framework of Article 134 and in compliance with Article 159 of the Constitution and this policy was implemented in the form of approvals of the Council of Ministers and by drafting regulations on how to resolve disputes between executive bodies by the governors and the legal assistant of the president and including the prohibition of paying government funds to raise disputes between ministries and government institutions in judicial proceedings. The country's annual budget has been followed and implemented. However, due to the lack of legal infrastructures and the lack of planning for coherent administrative and executive structures in the governorates, no significant results have been achieved. Therefore, in this research, which is organized in a descriptive-analytical and library method, while identifying the obstacles, strengths and weaknesses, ambiguity, silence, contradiction and conflict in the existing laws and regulations, we have tried to find solutions to empower, modify and revise the process. We present the law for resolving disputes between the executive bodies and the internal mechanisms of the executive branch.

The aim of this study was to investigate the challenges and solutions of proper governance in the banking system of the Islamic Republic of Iran, with emphasis on the enactment of citizenship rights in the administrative system. This research is applied in terms of purpose and is descriptive-analytical in terms of data collection method. Based on the results obtained in this study, it is clear that the indicators of citizenship rights in the country's banking system are in poor condition, and these conditions and many problems of the banking system create an important challenge in terms of trust, satisfaction and social capital. In particular, the results of this study indicate that the country's banking system is in an unfavorable situation in terms of transparency. There are also legal problems in the country in terms of legality and commitment to the principles contained in the enactment of civil rights in the administrative system. Meanwhile, in the document of citizenship rights in the administrative system, there are several cases to support and respect citizenship rights in all departments of the country, including banks and financial institutions. In general, based on the results obtained, it can be concluded that according to the upstream documents, much emphasis has been placed on respect for citizenship rights in the banking system; But the main problem is that in practice little attention is paid to the rights of bank customers.

The pathology of a comprehensive social security system is a necessity and the design of any comprehensive system requires the establishment of acceptable and efficient basic principles. These principles are basic strategies. The social security system has a set of legal principles such as the principle of inclusiveness, equality and government guarantee. The main question of the present study is what harms the social security system of the Islamic Republic of Iran in terms of legal principles governing it. The hypothesis of the research is based on the fact that the pathology of the social security system can show a general framework and the main characteristics of a dynamic and comprehensive social security and be a way to form a comprehensive system of welfare and social security in society. This study aims to change the social security system through its pathology.

The term “privatization” has not been defined in our laws. Privatization is a complicated and vague concept featuring various political, social, economic and legal aspects and outcomes. Before and after the Islamic Revolution, our legislator’s approach has been towards the domination of public and state ownership. But, a larger deal of attention was gradually paid to privatization due to numerous reasons such as domestic and foreign factors including the prevention of public and state sectors’ monopoly, stagnation of the society, downsizing of the government, valuing the private sector and entry to global trade and markets. The objective and distinct examples of such an approach is the Act 44 of the constitution and Islamic Republic of Iran’s first to sixth economic, social and cultural development plans. The most important objective of privatization has been enhancement of the entities’ efficiency and optimization of resource allocation in the majority of the countries. Valuing the privatization is in fact supplementing the state and public proprietorship. Such an overlap can remove the gaps and impediments and concomitantly put into effect all the national talents and competencies. The present study aims at elaboration of the adopted by value – legal analysis of Islamic Republic of Iran’s governance approach towards the process and concept of privatization.