فهرست مطالب amirali nojomian

This essay denotes the context for observation of cultural behavior of the sixth decade according to cultural formation and discourse analysis of this decade, those groups into the same historical era who have the same experience from the particular social occurrence - the WAR and holy defense. In this analysis of generation dependencies, theories, judgments and common values are studied about stable phenomenon, common meanings which is in the field of experience from the hidden generation, and transfer in this decade narrative stories. In this present essay to understand the interrelation of generations for narrative authors, we assist two terms: 1. the qualification that bring social sources and areas for this changes, and 2- the qualifications that come to form the content and ideological setting, and shows that traditional revolutionary ideological discourse creates a vast array of new ideas through the production processes, selection, and institutionalization which in significant way deployed the ideology of official and cultural deep-seated institutions. This discourse is a function of cultural formulations of sixth decade that is created in order to the crisis in moral system, resources mobilization, and the formation of chains of interaction among the cultural elites. In this cultural context, narrative authors advocated dominant discourse with their new ideas and provoked the answers of the other actors in the present social environment. The Cycle of “idea- answer- idea” is one of the methods and mechanisms of action that acts through the chains of action with formation of repeated dominant discourse. In this way, social experiences of the authors in this period, are as same as the ideological elements with positive and negative elements were recorded and written.

Based upon the major events of the past decades in the field ofcomparative literature, there seems to be a need for a new definition ofcomparative literature and comparative criticism. In this essay, thenew characteristics needed for the new definition of comparativeliterature and the approaches and methods of comparative criticism(especially interdisciplinary approaches) will be outlined. Theresearcher believes in order to understand these new characteristics,one needs to analyze and re-read the concepts of “the other”, “border”and “identity”. With the advent of translation theory, semiotics,narrative theory, postcolonial theory (especially diaspora theory) andcultural theory, there appeared drastic changes not only in the field ofcomparative studies but also in the methodology of comparativestudies. Therefore, the challenge we face at the moment is theexplanation of the approaches and methods based upon the newdefinitions. Consequently, three major theories and methodologies areproposed and it is claimed that the intertextual theory and methodsmatch best with the new definitions of comparative literature.