فهرست مطالب forouq najari

The purpose of this study is to study the factors affecting the development of higher education in Guilan province with the approach of Islamic management.

The present study is descriptive and the statistical population of the present study includes 3663 experts, professors and managers of higher centers in Guilan province. Using Morgan table, 331 people were determined as the sample size and their selection was done in a stratified-random manner. Also, the opinions of 15 experts were used to evaluate the criteria in TOPSIS and AHP models.

Library data collection method and data collection tool Researcher-made questionnaire consisting of 11 criteria and 37 sub-criteria in the form of internal and external organizational drivers and 12 criteria and 36 sub-criteria in the form of internal and external inhibitory factors The deterrent has been linked to indicators of higher education development. Analysis of pairwise comparisons of the findings showed that among the internal factors of propulsion, "factors related to finance and fair payment" with a weight ratio of 0.384 has the highest priority and "factor controlling religious-cultural teachings" with a weight ratio of 0.048 has priority Is the last. Also, among the extra-organizational criteria of the driving factors, the factor of "interaction with stakeholders" with a weight ratio of 0.419 has the highest priority and "weak physical resources" with a weight ratio of 0.026 has the highest priority. Also, among the internal criteria, the deterrents of "weak independence of universities" with a weight ratio of 0.223 have the highest priority and the factor of "competition" with a weight ratio of 0.051 is in the last priority. Finally, the analysis of external criteria of deterrents showed that the factor of "external interaction" with a weight ratio of 0.630 has the highest priority and "distance from the competitive environment" with a weight ratio of 0.218 in the second priority and finally "weak transnational interaction" with a weight ratio. 0.151 is in the last priority.

What became clear from the results of this study, in general in the areas of factors related to finance, process, accountability factor, physical factor, human factors, cultural factor, interaction with stakeholders, national quality assurance system, external interaction, It is a factor of technology and a factor of competition that should be considered by managers and stakeholders.