فهرست مطالب gholamhossein asgari

The purpose of this study was evaluating the relationship between fatty acid (FA) intakes and the Assisted Reproductive Technique (ART) outcomes in infertile women.

In this descriptive longitudinal study, a validated food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) was used to measure dietary intakes among 217 women with primary infertility seeking ART treatments at Isfahan Fertility and Infertility Center, Isfahan, Iran. The average number of total and metaphase II (MII) oocytes, the fertilization rate, the ratio of good and bad quality embryo and biochemical and clinical pregnancy were assessed. Analyses were performed using mean, standard deviation, Chi-square test, ANOVA, ANCOVA, logistic regression.

A total of 140 women were finally included in the study. There was a positive relationship between the average number of total and MII oocytes and the amount of total fatty acids (TFAs), saturated fatty acids (SFAs), monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs), polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), linoleic acids, linolenic acids, and oleic acids intakes, while eicosapentaenoic acids (EPAs) and docosahexaenoic acids (DHAs) intakes had an inverse relationship. Consuming more amounts of TFAs, SFAs, PUFAs, MUFAs, linoleic acids, and oleic acids was associated with the lower fertilization rate, whereas the consumption of linolenic acids and EPAs increased the fertilization rate. The ratio of good quality embryo was directly affected by the amount of PUFAs intakes. Additionally, there was a negative correlation between the amount of SFAs intakes and the number of pregnant women.

TFAs, SFA, PUFA, and MUFA intakes could have both beneficial and adverse impacts on ART outcomes.

Apart from that “Possession Will” which known as unilateral or bilateral contract it accepted as returnable or revocable by testator in the statutes of the most state. But the views are different that the testator has right forfeited his returning of possession will from himself or not. In Iranian Civil Law and Imamiyeh Jurisprudence if this clause included from within will certainly unreliable. If this right forfeited concluded with from within bilateral contract some lawyers know it null because it is contrary to spiritual law and some of them knows it correct. in Egyptian Law this clause is null. In English Law because returning of possession will is counted as essential elements of will, it is order not merely right and to take consideration forfeited this right is impossible. This research to describe this right and present a comparative study with Egyptian and English Law for this respect that to earn common basis and choice view that has most conformity with parallel to statute and Imamiyeh Jurisprudence.