فهرست مطالب hasan gharavi

The Holy Sharia has established several rights in the marriage contract to secure the couple's interests and strengthen the family's foundation. Most Imami jurists have recognized the right of lien for both parties in the exchange contracts and marriage. The right to lien is an option based on which each of the parties to the contract is allowed to refuse to perform his obligation until the other party's obligation is fulfilled. The recognition of the right to lien in family law, in addition to shattering the foundation of the family and increasing family harm, has increased the family's judicial challenges. The spread of unconventional dowers in Iranian society has doubled the problem of the right to lien. This has necessitated a jurisprudential review of the principles of the right to lien and the related laws. The research findings show that the jurisprudential principles of the right to lien face serious challenges. The current paper, using library resources with a critical analytical approach and examining various aspects of the mentioned issue, analyzes the jurisprudential foundations of the wife's right to lien in marriage. Therefore, after the preliminary reference to the right of lien in the legal system, it analyzes the jurisprudential-legal proofs and criticizes the most important views of Imami jurists. The research findings show that marriage is not considered as an exchange contract. And the right to lien in the exchange contracts and in marriage does not have a clear legal document.

Prominent mystics have always claimed the existence of an independent epistemological way of receiving facts, which some have considered its authority to be inherent and unconditional. As the founder of mystical and codified theoretical mysticism, Ibn Arabi has unique views on mystical epistemology, in particular the authority of revelation. His remarks on the infallibility of mystical revelations have given rise to the theory of the inherent authority of revelation among scholars. Researchers have been at odds over the quality of the inherent authority of revelation. Using the documentary-library method as a data collection, and descriptive-analytical method as an analysis with a developmental approach, this study seeks to reflect on the views of mystics, especially Ibn Arabi, in order to draw a consistent picture of inherent authority of mystical revelations. This article criticizes Ibn Arabi's words on the absolute authority of mystical revelations and, after stating the general rules about the possibility of proving inherent authority, will finally evaluate the most important claimed examples of the inherent authority.

Marriage in Islam as a divine covenant and woman as a pillar of this holy place has a fortune. The main throne was to consolidate love in the family and support for the woman. From the viewpoint of the jurisprudents of the Imams and Sunnis, the principle of Mahri has no doubt that the main difference is in its quantity, with the vast majority of Shi'a jurisprudents having considered the abnormal feast. The mahria, which at first showed the male-female honesty, has become a problem for the family. Negative consequences of an abnormal mahria on the life of a person, family and society are not in doubt. Now, the question arises whether, according to the jurisprudential justification, the voidness of the abnormal feast can be proved? Thought on the basis of the jurisprudence of the Mahrei shows that the abnormal mahriyah is inappropriate and inappropriate for some reason, and some of its foundations are not compatible with the rules of jurisprudence. Therefore, it seems that the holy shrine is not indifferent to the amount of Mahri, and it considers some restrictions. The present study deals with documentary-librarianship methodology and descriptive-analytical approach as an arbitrator.