فهرست مطالب jamshid mirzaee

Limiting the ownership of individuals in the implementation of approved urban plans is one of the challenging cases in urban planning law. It is obvious that when there is a conflict between two interests, you should choose an interest that includes a larger number of people in the society. Therefore, in the confrontation between private and public interests, priority is given to the public interest, which can be easily justified using general legal rules and principles.In the current research, the author has investigated the legal rules and regulations and judicial procedure in this field and the challenges in the two legal systems of Iran and France using the library method. What can be inferred from the comparison of the two legal systems and legislative developments in the field of urban planning rights and the institution of expropriation due to public interest is that the said institution has a long history in French law and has gone through many ups and downs, and the judicial procedure in This field has worked much more dynamically and effectively, but Iran's law in this field is younger and does not have the necessary efficiency. Therefore, it is suggested to the legislator, in order to protect the private property of individuals, by taking advantage of the successful experiences of other legal systems, including French law, to enact clear and transparent laws and to consider the guarantee of effective implementation for them, so as to avoid ambiguity and summaries of the law, so as not to witness the mismanagement of some offending institutions.

The health of society is the result of Godchr('39')s grace to humanity. Due to the supervision of the rule of account, the government should observe and have a sense of prudence and required precautions, and also it must behave wisely. The necessity of public health is considered as a principle of social life. The trustees of nature sometimes not only don’t observe the protection of nature, but also are a threat to the health of nature and human society by their actions. Jurisprudence and law, as two inseparable links and complement each other, are tools to use the inspirational messages of Islam to tariff the scene of the creation of glory to human beings; otherwise oblige the harmful to repair the damage. Although particulate matter has long dominated the health of all, its increasing trend in recent decades can be the product of natural affairs or the result of human activities; this is the deduction of health to the present world. The result of the realization of civil liability for health is restoration to its former state, which is not properly codified in our law at the moment. For example, the payment of compensation to the Treasury Fund itself is a flawed reason for civil liability goals. In this case, support for the health of the community and methods of restoring it to its pre-injury state, despite having rich jurisprudence and tradition, and in order to eliminate and prevent the process of dust, have not been expressed to prevent the pollution of the community in the first place. In this situation, we cannot inherit it for the future, unless the laws of our country in the field of health and environmental protection are revised.