فهرست مطالب kulthum miriasl

Sadegh Chubak highlights spaces outside the norm and accepted spaces in society in his fiction works, which is one of the prominent and distinctive features of his work. As a writer, a number of his fictional works are distinguished by the use of spaces like mortuaries, brothels, and animal stables as residences for characters, who mostly are prostitutes, outcasts, and poor or destitute women. Using an interdisciplinary approach, this article examines and analyzes Chubek's fictional spaces from the perspective of Michel Foucault's concept of heterotopia. Using feminist critical discourse analysis as a method of examining the identity of women within such spaces, I will show that Chubak's fictional works are heterotopic spaces of resistance and struggle by depicting heterotopic spaces of deviation and representation of female identity and gender. These spaces, in fact, aim to criticize and condemn the society that has caused the growth and emergence of anomalies and discrimination in relation to women's rights.

One of the requirements of a scientific research is sufficient knowledge aboutthe research background or research literature. Due to the expansion of studiesin the field of poetry and literature, in order to prevent duplication of such aresearch, the study introduced and reviewed researches that have been writtenin review of the works of Akhavan Sales. Using a descriptive-analytical andcritical method, the study presents time and thematic diagrams of theresearches. It is shown which of the currents criticism have been formedaround the investigation of Akhavan's works during the last six decades, whataspects of Akhavan's poetry have received the most attention, and what arethe advantages and drawbacks of the researches. This research concludes thatsome kinds of criticism have been formed on the Akhavan's poetry. Inexamining the structural aspects of Akhavan's poetry, the most importantareas are the study and analysis of language, narrative, and rhetoricalaspects, and the musical system of his poetry. Regarding the critique ofthe semantic system of Akhavan's poetry, the most controversial issuesare the study of Akhavan's poetry commitment and socio-politicalaspects of his poetry and the analysis of philosophical concepts andnational identity. The positive points of these researches are accuracy,scrutiny, detailed view, specialized view, attention to new approachesof criticism, and interdisciplinary studies in order to look at literaryworks in a different way. The repeating and cliché results, usingdescriptive and theoretical methods are some flaws of these researches.

Reading the critical views of poets with the aim of classifying and analyzing their approaches to literary criticism, while identifying their evaluation criteria in literary criticism, can be used as a criterion for evaluating their works. In addition to being a poet, Akhavān-Sāles had critical views in the field of literary criticism. The authors of this article, due to the special position of Akhavān-Sāles as a poet-critic, have classified and analyzed his theories based on Jacobson chr('39')s theory. Then the approaches and characteristics of criticism were discussed, regarding in his views. In expressing his critical views, Akhavān-Sāles emphasized the four elements of sender, receiver, context, and message. He considered successful poetry to be a poem arising from the poetchr('39')s feeling (emotive function), of social and human subject (referential function), with literary language (poetic function) and the power to influence a wide range of receivers (conative function). In his critical views, Akhavān-Sāles has not fallen into the trap of pure formalism, nor has accepted non-literary poetry. As a result, it can be said that his thorough knowledge of the subject is positive and his subjectivity in criticism could be considered as a negative aspect of approach

Discourse analysis as a linguistic approach to social science examines how literary works relate to the social environment and how these environments influence their method and style. Discourse of “committed and social literature” is one of the well-known discourses in contemporary literature which is analyzed in this paper, using Laclau and Mouffe’s method. Here, the formation of this discourse and Akhavān-Sālesʾs approach to it has been studied. It is shown in this paper that the relationship between literature and society causes Akhavān-Sāles as subject to be influenced by linguistic and non-linguistic discourse functions and the power behind the discourse. He consolidated his discourse system by creating deconstruction in rival discourses (Moje-no, Individual Romance, and Formalist Literature) and understanding the empty pointers of non-own discourses (literature's attention and commitment to people and society). In the semantic system of his own discourse, he considers society and its needs (as an independent variable) including art and literature (as a dependent variable) and by emphasizing the centeral pointer of one’s own discourse, he defines other floating pointers (such as art, artist, Ghazal, poem and poet). Using some strategies mentioned in this research, he seeks to strengthen his own discourse and weaken non- own discourses.