mohsen shariat jafari

The study performed to determine the relationship between landslide and increasing sediment load in Latian dam watershed. Sediment yield of six sub-basins were estimated with by two methods of MPSIAC and hydrometric station . More than 150 landslides were mapped by ETM and Google Earth image processing. Comparing the observed data with MPSIAC output in Lavasanat and Kond-Afjeh sub-catchments, it became clear that Lavasanat has less sediment yield. But, despite of this subject, observed sediment yield in Lavasanat hydrometric station is about two times in Kond–Afjeh, while the landslides area in Lavasanat and Kond–Afjeh sub-basins are 1.8 and 0.7 percent of the area. Based on the estimated sediment yield of MPSIAC model, the weighted average of specific sediment yield for Kond-Afjeh and Garmabdar sub–basins with landslide area of 0.7 and 2.4 percent are 387.02 and 431.39 m3km-2y-1 respectively, which means that increasing the relative percentage of landslide area from 0.7 to 2.4 percent, specific sediment yield increases by 11.5 percent. Based on data analysis in Roodak hydrometric station in Jajrood basin, average sediment discharge of the river in the first nine months of 1383 before Hajyabad landslide was 6.17 tons per day that increased to an average of 16.9 tons per day at nine months after landslide. This amount is equivalent to 170 percent increasing of sediment load in nine months after mentioned event. The interesting point is that this increasing of sediment yield was in the period of about 30% decrease in water debit . This means that not only increasing sediment yield of the river is not related to the water debit, but also, about 30% reduction of water debit is should reduce sediment yield. So, regarding to the area of 20.45 ha of Hajabad landslide zone, each hectare of landslide area could increase more than 8% of the sediment load in the river.

This research has been done for the study of morphology of Ghezel Ouzan River from Ostoor to Manjil dams in two gorge and floodplain basins at 37 years period based on aerial photos, topographic maps and field surveying. The results showed the mean sinuosity ratios of, 1.46 and 1.22 for gorges and floodplain basins so that they can be classified as meandering and sinuous river reaches respectively. More sinuosity at gorge basin is due to the geological and tectonically factors. In the other words, the river plan initiate and mature based on rock canal that originated from above mentioned geological factors. At floodplain basin in Pavehrood to manjil dam with 60 km length river reach, the river showed three obvious sinuous canaliform, sinuous point bar, sinuous braided and braided and anastomising plan . At period 37 years braiding extend in the boundary about 1.2 km widths in Hezarrood area. If the rate of widening of the river in this basin presumes in uniform rate, the velocity of the river widening is about 32 meters per year that is noticeable. Bank erosion with meandering form of the river in Haroonabad area through meandering growth and extensions of the loops occurred up to 850 meters at the mentioned periods. Based on central angel of meanders loops, 57.72 percents of loops are extended modes, 25.93 % very extended, 16.05 of others are new so the river has meandering hazard. Extension mode of the loop growth is the main mode with 56% frequency and based on water shear stress distribution, geometry of loops and relative radius of the loops, consequently accumulation point of the shear stress, the modes of translations, rotation, compounding and chute and neck cut off are observed. More than 75 % of canal shifting cases of the river is toward left bank so that the construction of any structures on the left bank of the river would be dangerous.

Downstream of Ghezel-ouzan River from Ostoor to Sefidrood dams with approximately 195 kilometers length studied in this research. For morphological study, the topographic maps and the aerial photos (1955 and 1992) on a scale of 1: 50000 are used. At the first step, the river plan was drawn in both gorge valley and flood plain basin and then geometrical characteristics such as width, wavelength and amplitude of meanders loops, sinuosity, radius and other factors of the meanders measured in two above-mentioned basins. This research showed that, the mean values of the central angle of meanders and sinuosity coefficient of the gorge river is 140.55 degree and 1.46 respectively. It is more than flood plain reach with 105.08 degree mean central angle and 1.22 sinuosity coefficients. Therefore, the river is more meandering in the mountainous reach. Lateral shifting of Ghezel-Ouzan River in flood plain reach showed that 63.3% and 26.6 % respectively occurred to left and right and 10.1 percent to both sides due to braiding. Lateral shifting of Ghezel-Ouzan River at flood plain reach indicates that lateral shifting of the river, occurred mainly toward the left bank, which is agreed to the direction of the tectonic stresses due to the plate tectonic movements. It proves that tectonic factors affect on river pattern even in the erosional reach. In gorge basin hydraulic bed-shear of the river is quantitatively 150 Pascal, whereas, shearing strength of volcanic rocks in gorge valley lies in the order 150 Mpa., i.e. one million times higher. Therefore, the erosional processes could not have formed the gorge valley. To prove this opinion, dip and direction of rock bank joints of the river in gorge basin recorded at field in 10 stations and about 439 joint surfaces. The centerline of the river channel drawn based on the topographic maps, and then, it changed to the series of broken and straight lines at the intervals of 250 m, and then their directions were determined. The rose diagram of rectifying river segments and rock joints of the gorge canal are similar with together. It shows that the river in mountainous basin had neotectonic predesigned pattern and the river current on the bedrock and only it partly can widening its valley.

The establishment and development of fast-growing trees with effective root systems and avoidance of deforestation are effective ways for slope stability and to reduce landslides. Soil reinforcement and reduction of erosion by tree root systems are influenced by physiological and ecological characteristics of roots. In this research, root reinforcement of Diospyros lotus, one of dominant species in the forests of northern Iran, was investigated by reinforced soil sampling and laboratory testing. Based on the results, shear strength of reinforced soil is related to two factors of root density and diameter. Evaluating test results by RDR and RDDI indexes showed that soil cohesion and shear strength of reinforced soil by Diospyros lotus roots increased by 207 and 350 percent respectively compared to unreinforced soil and this process has an effective role in Soil reinforcement and massive erosion control, especially in shallow landslides.

One of the most important problems that empirical model users in Iran are facing with, is that these models are prepared for countries with special conditions such as lithology factor, which scores are given based on geology condition of origin country that are not compatible for a vast country like Iran with a great lithological variation. This research was conducted to reduce such problems and increase the efficiency and localization of these kind of models and provides rock erosion sensitivity factor for their special conditions. In PSIAC and EPM as a common experimental models, lithology factor is an important agent among other effective factors. In this research, a comprehensive classification of erodibility has been produced in 10 orders, based on mineralogy, chemistry, texture, structure and mechanical properties. Regarding to aridity of many parts of the country, and low rate of soil generation, erodibility rates of geological formations would be an important tasks. Results showed that, about 70 percent of the area covered with very low to low strength lithology to erosion and have a high potential of sediment yielding. Geological formations’ erodibility has been classified in 30 Tamab watershed with order of 4 and the results are compared with EPM results and monitored values in river gauging stations. Results also indicated a good agreement with high confidence with natural conditions and with respect to other important factors of the watersheds such as topography and rainfall.