فهرست مطالب raziyeh sabzehali

Currently, the significant increase in financial crimes of government authorities is a serious threat to the public interest of the state, which causes irreparable damage to the strength of the basis of government. Therefore, the fight against financial crimes of goverment authorities is very importance. The most important effective ways to prevent the unjust and illicit possession of goverment authorities are to fight corruption and monitor the property and assets of public authorities. Financial crimes of goverment authorities have reduced government control over economic policies and weakened the state's economic security. The existence of financial corruption of government authorities indicates the malfunctioning of public institutions. Articles 8 and 20 of the UN Convention against Corruption ask on member states to increase honest and responsibility among their officials and to make it a criminal offense for to have the illegal property of a government authorities. The writers in the present article address the role of government institutions in preventing financial crimes and misappropriation of government authorities. Monitoring the property and assets of government authorities and goverment officials is an effective step towards improving administrative health, increasing public confidence in officials and improving Iran's position in the International Transparency Organization.The research method is descriptive-analytical and the library method has been used to collect the issues of the subject and by taking notes from the materials and analyzing the materials.

Abstract One of the big challenges of the present era is the Hnancial crimes of the governors and governmental officials. It is not a new issue but dates back to the beginning of the government. According to 47 article of constitution, legal ownership is respectful. Illegal ownership is not respected and lawmakers should avoid earning illegal wealth and monitor their wealth in order to prevent Tinancial crimes. When of hcoals wealth and properties are clear, currpotion will be prevented and people will trust the governors more. Accordingly to enhance public trust to the governmental officials and governors and increase administrative health executive bylaw for the rules investigating the governors wealth and properties in Islamic republic of Iran was passed on 23 .3.98. the research method used is experimental-descriptive method and library method was used.The method of the study was descriptive analytical and library method was used to collect literature and note taking also was used.

Since the formation of communities, there have been different reactions to the phenomenon of crime. In the past, in the process of defining the punishment, offender’s character was not taken into consideration but only the crime and its consequences. By positivism school, the offender’s character, “this newly emerged in criminal law”, was taken into consideration. Since then, criminal justice was realized not only according to the crime but also with respect to the offender’s character and understanding the circumstances which led to the commission of a criminal act. Since early twentieth century, it was felt the necessity of filing character dossier alongside with the criminal case in order to adopt a response proportional to the offender’s character to achieve refinement and treatment goals and to plan effectively the prevention and recidivism programs. Character dossier which is necessary to reform criminals is a record containing the comments by specialists in psychology, psychiatrist, psychologist and social workers about the criminal’s character in order to be used by the authorities to adjust the punishment to offender’s character. In Criminal Procedure Law 2013, Articles 203 and 286 predicts explicitly the character dossier filed against adults and also children. Obviously, according to changes in the Islamic Penal Code in 2013, some new proposed mechanisms including alternatives to imprisonment, probation, suspension of punishment, postponed sentencing, exemption from punishment all of which require appropriate response to the offender’s character, are not applicable without filing character dossier.