sirous parsa

Analytical policies of the Islamic Penal Code approved in 2012 on the basis of post-modern criminology components in contemporary IranAbstract:This article aims to investigate the analytical policies of the Islamic Penal Code approved in 1392 on the basis of the components of postmodern criminology in contemporary Iran with a descriptive and analytical method. The starting point of the discussion is the answer to this question: basically, what components is the postmodern criminological reading of the concept of crime and punishment based on, and to what extent are these components aligned or inconsistent with the provisions of the Islamic Penal Code approved in 2013. The findings indicate that the components of postmodern criminology include; Non-acceptance of legal assumptions, meta-narratives and Sharia rituals, non-acceptance of criminalization in order to protect a particular ideology or strengthen the ruling power, non-acceptance of gender, religious, racial segregation and discriminatory crimes are criminalization. research results; showed that the concept of crime and punishment in the Islamic Penal Code of Iran in the assumptions of the Islamic Penal Code such as; Divine limits, retribution and diat, as well as biased, ideologically oriented criminalization, white-collar criminalization without regard to white-collar crimes; It will be against the components of postmodern criminology.Keywords: crime, Islamic Penal Code, postmodern criminology, punishment

This article is an effective part of the political power component of postmodern criminology and its effects in the Islamic Penal Code approved in 2012 in contemporary Iran with a descriptive and analytical method. The complexity, intertextuality and fluidity of the phenomenon of power in changing relationships and social form have gone through great transformations. In the contemporary era, recognizing the concept of power based on the complex frameworks of postmodernism can clarify important aspects of this wide-ranging concept for researchers.The starting point of the discussion is the answer to this question: To what extent is the power component in postmodern criminology consistent or inconsistent with the provisions of the Islamic Penal Code approved in 2012? The findings indicate that part of the written articles of the Islamic Penal Code are aligned with the views of post-modern criminologists in the belief that political power was the factor in compiling these articles in order to strengthen the ruling ideology. research results; showed that the concept of crime and punishment in Iran's Islamic Penal Code is based on biased, ideologically oriented criminalization, white-collar criminalization without regard to white-collar crimes; Non-acceptance of criminalization in order to protect a specific ideology or strengthen the ruling power such as satellite and virtual space, non-acceptance of gender, religious, racial and discriminatory crimes, in line with the thought of post-modern criminologists in believing that political power affects criminalization. isKeywords: political power, postmodern criminology, Islamic Penal Code 1392,