جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "حکیمی" در نشریات گروه "علوم انسانی"

Wisdom, and consequently, philosophy as the symbol of rationality, is one of most important components of the formation of religious epistemology in the bilateral relationship of wisdom and narration. In this regard, enumerating revelation, wisdom, and heart intuition and discovery as means to religious knowledge, and using these three, Allameh Tabataba'i has tried to create a unitary approach in the area of religious knowledge. But, introducing separation and inventing terms like self-founded religious wisdom and treasured wisdom, Mr. Hakimi tries to imply independence of religious texts from philosophical understanding. It is attempted to study this issue through a library method and a comparison of the works of these two. Findings indicate a lack of correspondence between the two viewpoints and the approaches taken. Hakimi is found to fight and avoid philosophy as much as Tabataba’i is found to be a philosopher and practitioner of philosophy in the area of religious teachings, such that Hakimi emphasizes self-efficacy and argumentation of the appearances of religious texts and rejects any philosophical inquiry in religious texts.

Examining the role of ta`wīl in understanding religious texts and passing from the appearances of the words of Quranic verses has been one of the most challenging issues for Muslim scholars. In the last century, appearance of the school of tafkīk, and specifically denial of ta`wīl and emphasis on the necessity of the purity of the appearances of Qur'anic texts, has led to two poles of proponents and opponents of ta`wīl in the field of religious studies. This article examines the issue with an analytic method and library-based technique and compared of the works of professor Hakimi and Allameh Tabatabai in the field. The findings indicate maximum difference between the two views in the type and method of explanation. Also, due to the revelation`s state of being of various levels, no sect or school has escaped from ta`wīl. The way to separate the appearances of religious texts to avoid ta`wīl will remain an impractical idea and dream.