جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "division of social work" در نشریات گروه "علوم انسانی"

Social solidarity, as the most important part of a society, has a special and important place and in addition to its intrinsic functions in the management and regulation of social affairs, its existence is necessary to maintain and stabilize the socio-political system. Therefore, the present article intends to study and recognize its shaping factors in the views and ideas of Ibn Khaldun as a Muslim social philosopher and Emile Durkheim, theorist of social solidarity. Therefore, an attempt has been made to study the research issue in the framework of functionalism approach using descriptive-analytical and documentary method. With the hypothesis that "Asabiyyah" in Ibn Khaldun's thought and "interactions between individuals in the form of division of social work" in Durkheim's thought, is the main factor of social solidarity. Also, the starting point of each of these two thinkers is the degree of interaction and interaction of members in social relations, which in terms of the formation and continuity of the political and social system, the distance (rotation) of Ibn Khaldun's theory and Durkheim's theory are linear. It becomes. Ibn Khaldun's reputation as the most important social thinker in the Islamic world owes more than anything to the concept of Asabiyyah and its place in social change, which includes the five stages from birth to decline. Hence, it seems that Ibn Khaldun's social theory in terms of social transformation and its effect on the formation and continuity of the political system is of the type of rotational and conflict theory and Durkheim's social theory is also a monolithic and evolutionary theory. Although Emile Durkheim is known as a theorist of social solidarity, but thinkers such as Montesquieu, Saint Simon, Comte, Rousseau and even Ibn Khaldun in the Islamic world can be named who have focused on social harmony and cohesion.

In this paper, in order to understand the process of the development of the family institution in contemporary Iran, a descriptive-analytical study of the trend of modernization and social changes in the last century in Iran with rationalization, division of social labor and disembody has been addressed. The research is based on qualitative research, with the use of historical and documentary methods. Since the research problem is question the discovery of the causation of the development of the family. Up-to-down form of modernizing, has led to the formation of a family institution in a special way; rationalization of society, division of labor and the assignment of family functions to new institutions as well as migration and sedition have been effective factors in shaping the new form of family. These historical trends have made the transformation of the extended family to the nuclear one, in the context of modernization, in a way that it can be called the "dependent family", because the migration from the kinship network leads to maintain family ties and family support and to prevent the formation of a nuclear family independently. A modern woman emanates from such a background and employs social life, while still affiliated with the social context, a dependent individual from the modern social system.