جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « implementation challenges » در نشریات گروه « علوم انسانی »

The main issue in the current research is to evaluate the performance of family courts regarding the judgments issued regarding the marriage allowance and its current judicial procedure in Iran's legal system. In this article, an attempt is made to analyze and examine the existing practical procedure in the courts as well as the jurisprudential and legal foundations of the demand for marital alimony, and also to express examples of conflicting opinions issued in the judicial courts to evaluate and criticize the legal citations and the existing judicial procedure. Because the existence of loopholes and ambiguities in the field of legislation has caused the lack of uniformity of procedure in the courts and the emergence of confusion and the issuing of mixed opinions from the family courts. In this research, the type of research is basic and the research method is descriptive and analytical, and since judicial procedure is considered as one of the sources of law, it has been tried as much as possible, in addition to introducing the current procedure, as a witness, some joint rulings from the family courts, which are randomly selected, to be cited and the decrees issued in this field should be analyzed, and as a result, by approving and interpreting the laws related to reciprocity and issuing unanimity votes in issues where conflicting opinions have been issued, implementation challenges can be minimized.

The main issue in the current research is to evaluate the performance of family courts regarding the judgments issued regarding the marriage allowance and its current judicial procedure in Iran's legal system. In this article, an attempt is made to analyze and examine the existing practical procedure in the courts as well as the jurisprudential and legal foundations of the demand for marital alimony, and also to express examples of conflicting opinions issued in the judicial courts to evaluate and criticize the legal citations and the existing judicial procedure. Because the existence of loopholes and ambiguities in the field of legislation has caused the lack of uniformity of procedure in the courts and the emergence of confusion and the issuing of mixed opinions from the family courts. In this research, the type of research is basic and the research method is descriptive and analytical, and since judicial procedure is considered as one of the sources of law, it has been tried as much as possible, in addition to introducing the current procedure, as a witness, some joint rulings from the family courts, which are randomly selected, to be cited and the decrees issued in this field should be analyzed, and as a result, by approving and interpreting the laws related to reciprocity and issuing unanimity votes in issues where conflicting opinions have been issued, implementation challenges can be minimized.

This study aims to investigate how artificial intelligence (AI) influences the development of demand forecasting systems in retail businesses, identifying the benefits, challenges, and opportunities presented by AI technologies. A qualitative research design was employed, using semi-structured interviews as the primary method for data collection. Participants included 20 managers and experts in the fields of retail and information technology, selected through purposive sampling. Five main themes were identified: the use of AI in demand forecasting, challenges in implementing AI, opportunities created by AI, effects on organization and strategy, and social and ethical impacts. AI was found to enhance demand forecasting accuracy, operational efficiency, and customer satisfaction. However, technical, organizational, and financial challenges were also noted. Despite the challenges associated with AI implementation, the study concludes that AI has a significant positive impact on improving demand forecasting and overall retail business performance. Retailers are encouraged to embrace AI technologies to stay competitive in the rapidly evolving market.

The inability of the international community to face seriously with Widespread and organized human rights violations as well as difficulties in and justifying the legal foundations of humanitarian intervention triggered a doctrine of "Responsibility to Protect" doctrine. In the light of the modification of the "principle of non-interference" and the attempt to redefine the concept of "national sovereignty", the main idea of this doctrine is that as a result of the development of international human rights norms and the idea of "Human Security", sovereignty assumes the primary responsibility of protecting its citizens that in the event of unwillingness or inability to act, the international community is responsible. This article from the perspective of international relations and based on a descriptive-analytical method, answers the question that what challenges does the effectiveness of the doctrine of protectionist responsibility face? the responsibility to protect doctrine? The hypothesis of the present article is that doubts about the meaning and nature of this doctrine, the possibility of using it as a tool to intervene in states, as well as its weaknesses in the implementation phase, are the most important challenges of the doctrine of responsibility to protect. In the light of this critique, this article concludes that the complexities and conceptual conflicts, as well as the practical challenges of implementing this doctrine, have cast doubt on its effectiveness in establishing a new international order and the dynamics of international relations in the face of human rights crises.

This article conducts a comparative analysis of the rights of religious minorities in the constitutions of Afghanistan and Pakistan. Given the profound influence of Islam on the political and legal frameworks of both countries, their constitutions contain provisions that directly and indirectly define and limit the rights of religious minorities. The paper explores the similarities and differences in the general principles, rights, and freedoms of religious minorities in these two nations, and examines the common and unique challenges and obstacles in the implementation of these rights. The findings indicate that both countries face similar challenges, such as the influence of extremist religious groups and the weakness of judicial and executive institutions in protecting minority rights, although differences exist in their approaches to addressing these issues. Finally, the article offers recommendations for improving the status of religious minority rights in both countries.