جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "philosophical explanation" در نشریات گروه "علوم انسانی"

The relationship between science and philosophy can be examined from various aspects; One of them is the question of the relationship between "scientific description" and "philosophical explanation." empiricists believe that there is no relation between the question of why phenomena are in the position of explanation, and how they are in the position of description and that the boundaries of natural science are independent of metaphysical and physical philosophy. In the meantime, paying attention to the thoughts of Avicenna, who was familiar with both philosophy and natural science, can be useful. In the Avicennian philosophy, explanation differs from the description, but it is not independent. The method of philosophical explanation, both in metaphysical philosophy and in physical philosophy, is effective in the method of scientific description. Thus, methodologically, description is the opposite of prescription, not explanation. Accordingly, without having any model of causal relations, it is not possible to provide a methodical description of natural and scientific phenomena. The main features of this causal model include: distinguishing between causal and intrinsic causality, near and far causality, simple and compound causality, potential and actual causality, and also the effect of causal relations in scientific attribution and reasoning.

God`s being of a child is of those attended issues in different religions and denominations. The question of the study follows as: what may one say about God`s childbearing on the basis of Ibn Sina, Mulla Sadra and Allameh Tabataba`i`s reasonable principles on the third verse of the chapter Tawhid? The method of the study is analytical and descriptive and the findings are offered in tables and logical propositions. On the findings of the research, Ibn Sina has based God`s impossibility of childbearing on the necessity of common nature of the father and the child; Mulla Sadra has proposed three proofs in the field of which the third is more defensible with regard to his philosophical foundations; while the first and the second are not defensible as not being correctly explained and not being in agreement with his principles of the departure movement. And Allameh has based the impossibility on God`s uniqueness of Existence.
.

This article is going to disscus about philosophical explanation of the stages and typology of research methodology in psychology. Our method in this article is to analyze the qualitative content of psychology texts and sources and critically examine them with a philosophical rational approach. This study is presented in four sections: reporting, analysis, classification and criticism. Some of which are: The steps of the research method can be divided into four categories: problem statement; research background; data collection; and analysis, interpretation and evaluation of information. According to the three approaches of quantitative, qualitative and mix method research, it can be said that quantity is one of the nine philosophical accidents such as number, form and time and is rooted in the positivist paradigm. Quality in qualitative research method is also one of the accidents dealing with the three categories of sensibility, susceptibility, and psychic qualities. The philosophical foundations of qualitative research methods are interpretive, communicative, reflective, and qualitative. Criticisms of interpretive and critical paradigms are also significant here. The qualitative and quantitative research method, although looking at different paradigms, but because focusing on the single issue, and being complementary of these two approaches the mix method researches are possible.