جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "the method of analysis" در نشریات گروه "علوم انسانی"

The emergence and development of qualitative methodology over the past few years in the social and human sciences community of Iran has been the subject of controversy in theory and practice in a number of ways. The increasing attention to and increasing the use of quality methods in the academic community of the country not only requires familiarization with this methodology and how it is designed and implemented, but also requires familiarization with the analytical procedures of these methods and their use. But these standard procedures are rarely introduced as an applied article. The purpose of this paper is to introduce standard procedures for analyzing qualitative data and related techniques in a brief and practical way. So, with the help of library resources research methodology, 11 comprehensive methods of this field have been examined. These include: Ethnographic Thematic Analysis, Grounded Theory, Narrative Analysis, Phenomenological Analysis, Qualitative Content Analysis, Conversation Analysis, Semiotic Analysis, Thick Description, Situational Analysis, Discourse Analysis, Observational Data Analyze. In the final section of the paper, a brief practical summary of the coding method in qualitative methods is presented.

In his work, Rene Descartes has referred to the effect of mathematics on his mind. He, as a founder of algebra and analytic geometry, believes that it is only the mathematical knowledge that can properly be called “knowledge”. However, the question is why the Cartesian method is referred to by some of his commentators as well as the majority of Persian sources as a “geometrical” method, while most scholars have emphasized on his mathematical method. Descartes paved the ground for mathematical physics. For him, geometrical features such as point, dimension, and extension are essential to the matter. I believe that the emphasis on his geometrical method and the priority of geometry amounts to the priority of the material substance and materialism in Descartes, which is in conflict with Cartesian views, because he believed in souls and God as two immaterial substances. In his philosophy, mathematics is originated in the reason and rationality, and mathematical proofs are certain and clear just because of their rational origins. However, the mathematics involved in the mathematical method is not the general ordinary mathematics; rather it is the mathematics that was divided, since the time of Aristotle, into “pure mathematics” and “applied mathematics”. This paper seeks an answer to the following questions: what is the difference between the geometrical and mathematical methods? In which of the two is there more clarity, distinctness and certainty? For Descartes, what problems can be solved by the mathematical method and what problems can be solved by the geometrical method?

The book Al-Burḥān Fi Tafsīr al-Qur’an by the great traditionist Sayed Hāshim Baḥrānī is an encyclopedia of exegetical traditions. The Qur’an exegesis is a knowledge of discovering Allah's Wills, which may be represented through two methods of intellect and narration. The present paper, based on the descriptive-analytic method, seeks to discover the bases, principles, and method of selecting narrations in the commentary of al-Burḥān and its strengths and weaknesses, as well as the important viewpoints of this great Shi'i scholar on main issues. Findings show that the author, based on his own methodology of authenticating narratives through the validity of quoting them in major Hadith Collections and because of their reference to the dignity and merits of Ahlulbayt (PBUTH), has mostly expressed the certain quantity of hadiths on particular subjects. He has rarely paid attention to the qualitative and intrinsic analysis of hadiths. Accordingly, he has paid only to chains of transmitters and the multiplicity of ways of quoting them for a bunch of narratives, regarding to the attributes of sands such as ḥusn (goodness) and tawātur (repeating) for the validity and authenticity of the traditions, and for a range of narratives he has looked at content and the existence of contradictions between them, in where he has confined in the “summarized notional conclusion”.