جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "فرزدق" در نشریات گروه "ادبیات و زبان ها"

Critical discourse analysis is one of the scientific approaches in language studies that has raised discourse analysis from the level of text description to the level of interpretation and in terms of scope of research, has developed the level of context from the individual to the macro level, ie society, history and ideology. . The main purpose of discourse analysis is to achieve a new way of studying texts, media, cultures, sciences, politics, society and the like. In this article, Theon van Dyke's socio-cognitive approach was chosen as a special method for this research, because he has found a critical approach to critical discourse analysis. By combining the three concepts of discourse, knowledge, and society, he formed the triangle that formed the basis of his distinctive theory of critical discourse analysis. In this context, the poetic contradictions between Farzadagh and Jarir in the Umayyad period are among the works that can be studied in the field of critical discourse analysis, because they allow the analyst and the critic the relationship between power, ideology and discourse. Reveal it. This article tries to analyze the two satirical contradictions selected by Farzadagh and Jarir by relying on Van Dyke's ideological square which examines the subject of two contradictions from the perspective of self-emphasis (essence) and marginalization of the other (last). And put analysis; to show how the ideology of these two poets is shown in their satirical confrontations. One of the most prominent results we have reached through this article is that highlighting other negative points in both contradictions is much stronger than highlighting its positive points, resulting in a process of polarization and distance between oneself and another has been created. The similarity of formal structures puts the discourse of both contradictions in common contexts, which have similar designs and are a function of power-ideology relations.

Loyalty, recreation and literary creation are three distinct approaches in translation which are achieved in different layers of semantics, surface and tone while some are related to another. Loyalty is essential for recreation and without recreation, the translation will not be sufficiently expressive in the target language. Beyond recreation, literary creation offers an exquisite work without respecting the principle of loyalty. This exquisite work is different in many linguistic and even semantic layers from poetry that is more evident because of its literary features, especially if the translator is a tasteful poet. With the help of stylistic analysis, the current research tries to investigate the poem of Jami which has been written under the great influence of Al-Farazdaq’s fine eulogies in praise of Imam al-Sajjad. This is to determine the manner and measure of loyalty, recreation and literary recreation of the poem of Jami toward the poem of Al-Farazdaq, according to the features of Jami’s work and commonalities and distinctions among the two literary Pieces in domains of semantics, surface and Aesthetics. This research uses descriptive-analytical approach; however, in some cases statistical approach will be used to determine the amount of creativity and innovation or loyalty of Jami toward the original text. Considering the clear distinctions between the poem of Jami and Al-Farazdaq in the layers of phonetics, vocabulary, rhetoric, emotion and Syntax, Jami’s work is not only a loyal translation of the source text but also a translation which is comparable to something created and is related to the source in general. However, there is no corresponding relationship between them in terms of detail and verses.