جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "articulation" در نشریات گروه "ادبیات و زبان ها"

In every text, there are two levels of ambiguity of translation and ratio, which are the basis of the rhetorical explanation of the text from different perspectives of textual analysis, whether formalistic or discursive. In most of the classical texts, the aforementioned levels of ambiguity more or less exist, but in some texts, one aspect outweighs the other. Sa’adi's Golestān is one of the texts whose rhetorical basis is based on the ambiguity of ratio and types of displacement and articulation. In this article, the rhetoric of Golestān or the confrontation of the author-narrator with the listener/reader is classified and interpreted based on the ambiguities of the relationship between the creator of the text in the form of displacement and the significance of linguistic-narrative articulations. The basis of the analysis is the concepts and terms of several communicative fields such as semantics, rhetoric, narratology and discourse analysis. The result shows that, according to the dominant aspect of ratio ambiguity in Golestān, the author-narrator of the text uses four levels of extension / floating, pre-information, connection / eclecticism and repetition/accumulation in order to convey meaning or communicate the "Message–Force." Some of these cases, while creating diversity, contain the type of openness and polyphony, which help to draw the attention of listeners/readers. In some cases, the direction-inhibition aspect of the text restrains the listener/reader under the support-control umbrella of the author-narrator. Of course, all cases considered, while directing the listeners/readers, in most cases the text leads them to an open state of reality, which does not limit inferences in the reader’s encounter with the textual and conceptual representations.

This study is about to find how conceptual metaphors help in drawing identity borders and attaining legitimacy. So, the semantic system of conceptual metaphor (Kováces, 2010) and the components of myth and social imagination (derived from Laclau and Mouffe’s discourse theory, 2001) make the theoretical framework of the research to find how the semantic system affect reaching general legitimation. To answer the research question, Joe Biden’s speech in his inaugural ceremony in 20 Jan. 2021 is used as the case study. Based on the findings, metaphor provides a cognitive framework for expressing ideological ideas. Each metaphor in this discourse foregrounds a concept and backgrounds the alternative ones. The president conceptualizes the USA as “America is human” metaphor to accompany the nation, and avoid the party-based views. As a result, metaphor is a tool for avoiding clear border-makings, foregrounding concepts, and representing different views according to conceptual domains. Though using metaphor, discourses can turn to a discourse having the least out groups and the most in groups in a country. Therefore, conceptual metaphor provides a base for creating an ideal space for myth-making. Through such tools, Biden tried to capture a discourse trying to attract the attention of the most and avoid rejecting the potential groups.

The purpose of foreign language teaching is the ability to communicate as closely as possible with the target language (Azimov, 2009, 98). The first step in understanding and transmitting meaning is in the foundations of phonology. Regardless of the learner's mastery of grammar and lexical knowledge, the incomprehensibility of pronunciation can actually impair communication. The purpose of this study is to compare the pronunciation of Persian language students in the pronunciation of some Russian phonemes with standard pronunciation. A comparative study in this area provides the possibility of minimizing the negative impact of the phonetic system of the mother language (here Persian language) on learning a second language (here Russian language). The results clearly show that Russian phonemes, which are similar to those in Persian (Including fricative consonants examined in this article), have practically no correspondence with each other in terms of physical characteristics, intensity, phonology, strength, articulation, first formant, second formant active and inactive speech organs. Students also pronounce Russian words, replace the original sample with Persian phonemes. This creates an accent that takes education away from its original purpose. Investigate how this deviation in producing these sounds is formed, it can greatly help the students to eliminate it.

The research deals with the subject of "Classical Arabic" and its dialects, based on the hypothesis that common Arabic is a later industry on the "languages" and "tones" of the Arabs, which were nurtured, wisely, and graced by the spiritual needs that characterized it and elevated it to become an optimal and definitive language, i.e. a language of inspiration that turns into a language of revelation. It was this situation given to the Arabic language that made the Arabs a metaphysical picture of their language. On the other hand, the transition from a natural linguistic level to a higher linguistic level required the intervention of a generation of grammarians who had experience not in dialects and classical, but in Semitic languages ​​as well, in order to establish the peculiarities and uniqueness of order. Moreover, the relationship of classical with the “languages” of the Arabs confirms that “Arabic” has its own way of evoking diversity and change, and that the “languages” do not stand at the opposite end of the Standard, but rather the two sides weave a cohesive relationship between them that protects and sanctifies the division of labor between them.

Cinema represents political, social and cultural realities. Critical discourse analysis also signifies linguistic text realities based on features such as ideology, society, culture and policy. The purpose of the present research is to provide a study of sociol discourses of the movie Cow based on Laclau and Mouffe’s (2001) theory. To this end, the full text of the conversations of the movie Cow was examined. Then, th data were described and analyzed for the discourse features proposed in Laclau and Mouffe’s (2001) theory. The results of the study indicate that the discourse of the movie is articulated around the central signifier Cow’s death" and the floating signifiers such as "poverty", "being religious", "unemployment", "closed society", "lying", "dependency on Cow", "unity", "unawareness" and "metamorphosis". In addition, the dominant discourses of the movie are "religion, tradition and collectivism". Through the examination of the highlights and background  features of role of the actors and actresses in the movie Cow, it was found that the signifiers "lying", "metamorphosis" and "poverty" are highlighted in this movie whereas the floating signifier "being religious" is backgrounded.

own self dimensions and delegitimize the others’ elements; legitimation, from the semiotic-discursive point of view, is a process that hegemonizes power through discourse articulation. The authors’ aim in this paper is to investigate and identify the way in which the legitimating mechanisms of gendered discourses function in contemporary Persian story literature. Hence, they provide a deconstructive reading of the methodology of Van Leeuwen (2007) based on Laclau and Mouffe (2001) and Derrida (1983) and take advantage of a variety of linguistic tools. Then, in order to analyze the functions of these mechanisms, they go through the “Solok” and purposefully examine some of its parts. Finally, they respond to the research question about how the legitimizing mechanisms of gendered discourses operate and introduce four structures, i.e. simple, compound, complex, and chain, in those mechanisms. Moreover, they show that after gaining and achieving the legitimacy, the gendered discourses step forward to maintain and fix the legitimacy and delegitimize the other explicitly and implicitly- by the way of recontextualization.

 

Morisson's Beloved is the story of sixty million black slaves who died under the hegemony of the dominant discourse of white bourgeoise ideology. Black characters remember their past according to the picture in their minds and then attempt to re-construct it in a new light. Thus, the grand narrative - in Lyotards' words - of white people of America is under constant challenges from the black little narrative. On the other hand, Mikhail Bakhtine's theory of dialogism and polyphonic novels state the same thing. In some novels - those of Dostovesky's, for example - the different and opposing voices in the novels are put together in a linear position with the voice of the author just next to them. In other words, each character will construct his/her own narrative and thus undermines the dominant discourse or the Grand Narrative. Thus, the aim of this essay is to compare the mentioned theories and then apply them to the novel.

Style in favor of one of the most frequent rhetorical structures Quran. It has a variety of actions during the capture (using the present tense rather than the past or vice versa, etc.), pronouns and verbs change approach (the absent audience or vice versa) and use pronouns instead of names or vice versa.
The study also looked at the concept and function of art in favor of it, the art and semantic aspects of the industry-level analysis of pronouns concubines (the absent to audience, the absent to speaker, speaker to the audience, speaker to the absent, the audience the absent) at that Quranic have been sampled.
Scope of each type of attention - including the pronouns - we understand the nature and function of art and industry, rhetorical and semantic aspects will assist in the revelation. Finally favor of the examples in the Quran, revealed that the pattern of artistic and aesthetic function of language in addition to their important role in conveying the meaning to words of the speaker and the audience impact and its sustainability.

The narrative of Hallaj’s life and death always has had the capacity and potential to introduce the themes and signs of mystical discourse. Some of these discourses absorb symptoms as "floating signifiers" gradually and articulate them with a different nature and provide some changes for mystical discourse. Under the Constitution, unlike the past that the mystical discourse and narrative texts related to Hallaj were dominant and reading Hallaj was a reflection of his spiritual authority, leftist movements highlighted elements of the Hallaj’s mystical discourse with reductionism and stereotyping and representing two different types of mysticism and separation the passive and inefficient mysticism of revolutionary one, and articulated them with central slab left discourse. The most obvious example of this discursive turn is seen in two distinct readings by Massignon and Mirfetrus that one of them based his narrative on the context of spiritual discourse and documented historical fact and another on the form of left-wing ideological discourse,as Mirfetrus can be the culmination of change mystical discourse into revolutionary one. This article is an overview of the two types of indented deal with mysticism,change and absorb of some elements of mystical discourse in the revolutionary discourse. The result of this change and absorb is replacing divine love- as the base of Hallaj’s live and death- with materialism and humanism on one hand and replacing spiritual and mystical sermons with witchcraft and promoting atheism on the other hand toward the popular revolution.

Based on the theory of Laclau and Mouffe، the present paper attemps to investigate the status of women in two distinctive political discourses of the 1380s. To this end، the first step is to distinguish the two political discourses of the aforementioned period by means of discourse theory. In this period، two political discourses، namely reformist discourse with nodal points of reform، political development، freedom، law، and civil society as well as conservative discourse with nodal points of justice، kindness، progress، mental and physical elevation، and service providing were identified. Examining the signifiers shows that these two discourses are each other’s discursive others and as a result the discrepancies between the two should be seen in other fields as well. Investigating the texts indicated that with a modernist tendency، reformist discourse has women participation as the core of its articulation while the conservative one with its conventional tendency، considers the family orientation as its articulation point. Although both discourses find family orientation as one main signifier، the former views women in light of strengthening their skills، education and awareness، while the latter identifies women with religious beliefs deepening، Hijab and chastity.