جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "rahat-al-sodour" در نشریات گروه "ادبیات و زبان ها"

Rahat-Al-Sodour and Ayat-Al-Sorour (603Ah.) is a historic book by Mohammad-Ibn-Ali-Ibn-Soleiman Raavandi in Seljuk dynasty. In addition to its historic advantages, from its perspicuity of composition and intricacy of the abundant social information, this book is considered as one of the most authentic and beneficial Persian books before the Mongol attack.  The topic of charisma could be compared in this work with the other Persian-language works. One of the other famous Persian-language works is Beihaghi’s History, which had been authorized by Abolfazl Beihaghi, as a historic-literary book, and its main topic is the history of the first Masoud monarchy as the son of Mahmoud Ghaznavi. Therefore, charisma topic could be investigated in comparing these two given works. This topic has a particular glitter in both works. The most significant question mentioned in this query is that how are both authors’ viewpoints to the charismatic myth? It is concluded that although in Rahat-Al-Sodour and Beihaghi’sHistory, the topic of charismatic myth is obvious and traceable, their both viewpoints to this topic is different in concepts and application. The charismatic myth in Rahat-Al-Sodouris presented in the form of function, visual manifestation, celestial endorsement, and stipulation to the charismatic lexicon and in Beihaghi’s History is more conducted in the form and vesture of celestial fatalism, some ceremonial manifestation such as Mehregan festival, the power of hunting the Lion by Masoud, and etc. This research is conducted by the content analysis and using the library-based sources.

Texts are product of social and linguistic forces. That’s why we should not search the rules of the game in the texts themselves but in the institutional functions that produce them. Reading Ravandi's representation of Ale Seljuk History with the approach of critical discourse analysis shows that the text produced at the end of the Seljuk Empire reflected the set of dominant discourses in the Seljuk era. The relation between power and legitimacy that are characteristics of Seljuk era is reflected in this text as a general principle reproducing certain aspects of social identity. Religious discourses focused on power, opponent or centrifugal discourses and scientific discourses focused on policy get help from other discursive elements reflecting the discursive patterns of the era. Social agencies of the Seljuk Era contain ideological discourse organizations that through panopticon monitoring, connect with different groups in the institution of power.