جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « Equality » در نشریات گروه « ادبیات و زبان ها »

Intertextuality is a literary approach that allows critics to examine the links between the works in a scientific and systematic ways. The relationship of texts is a topic that was considered by researchers with structuralism. The first time, Kristova used “intertextuality” in textual relations. Later, people studied intertextual issues from different perspectives. One of them was Gerard Genette, who studied the intertextual relations in a broader and more systematic ways with all its variations and called it Hypertextuality. Genette is one of the most important theorists of this approach, which plays a key role in its application. Genette discusses the relationship of a text to each other. One of the intertextual concepts is the explicit and implicit influence of literary texts from other sources. This article uses library and analytical research methods with the aim of establishing a relationship between the intertextual theory of Genette and the types of influences from each other. The subject of his research is Alexander's Sharafnameh as a pre-text to examine and analyze them together based on Genette's views and they try to answer the following questions such as whether the pre-text of Alexander's story Shahnameh had an effect on the back text of Alexander's story Sharafnameh?

Due to the formation of numerous translations of the Qur'an and the important role of translation in relation of all sections of society with the teachings of the Holy Qur'an, scholarly criticism of the translations of the Holy Qur'an has emerged as one of the areas of Qur'anic studies in contemporary period. The importance of research in this field is understood when we see translational errors leading to differences in the perceptions of the Qur'an among the general public. Studies of the criticism of the translations of the Qur'an have sought to establish a critical mechanism for evaluating the translations of the Qur'an and hence, it introduces the translators slip places. The present study, through a descriptive and critical analysis, has investigated " Assumming different words as one due to negligence " as one of the slips of the Persian translators of the Holy Qur'an. Enumerating different types of assumming different words as one due to negligence, the two types of " Negligence in diagnosing the root of the words"and “Negligence in pay attention to the differences between similar constructions” have introduced and gave them 12 examples. Statistical reports of translators' performance in the studied samples indicate that translations of Ansarian, Bahrampour, Safavid Mousavi Garmaroudi and Ali Akbar Taheri's have the lowest Negligence. On the other hand, the translations of Mohammad Ebrahim Boroujerdi (9 slips), Mohammad Kazem Arfa (7 slips), Ibrahim Ameli (6 slips), Mohammad Kazem Moezzi (6 slips) have had less success in staying away from Assumming different words as one due to negligence.

Ode is the first poetry form that Iranaian poets composed in it. In dispite of all the ups and downs, this form was a legimate and normal form (beside of ghazal and mathnavi) untile parliamentary revolution. But when parliamentary revolution happened, some poets and open- mInded as Aghakhan e Kermani, Akhundzade, Rafat,… opposed to ode and it's content (praise is the majer content of ode) and this form converted to an unnormal form and was being to decline suddenly. The reason of these converthons must be searched in converthons of episteme (modern and premodern). In a premodern episteme that it's presupposithon is unequality, ode is a normal form. In this episteme  the language is mild, favorable and flattering and it is compatible to ode, so ode is a usual form. But in the modern episteme  that it's presupposithon is equality, a flattering language isn't usual. So ode can not be a normal form in this episteme.