جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « آگامبن » در نشریات گروه « علوم سیاسی »

The author considers Schmitt's and Agamben's state of exception as "Voluntary State of Exception" and propose a new type of state of exception (entitled "Involuntary State of Exception"). Then he explains the foundation and possibility of this second type of state of exception in Iranian society. The author's main argument is that by the gradual combination of the four inevitable super-events (including "general crisis of capital accumulation", "expansion of digital technology in everyday life", "increasing class displacement" and "generational transformation of the dominant traditional power elites"), Iranian society is on the path of a triple great imbalance and an all-out historical discontinuity and ultimately, entering an involuntary state of exception. The author calls this potential state of exception as "Fundamental Question of Iran" and determines the specific process of its occurrence in four stages including "early formation", "great transformation", "liminality", and "hour of involuntary state of exception".According to the author, with the beginning of the "liminality stage" and especially with the oncoming of the "hour of involuntary state of exception" in Iranian society, the existential condition of power elites and social forces transform and everyone feel that they have entered a new historical stage. Therefore, excitement, anxiety and conflict grow in the society. From his point of view, although Iranian involuntary state of exception is not an ultimate and constant situation and there is a possibility of rethinking; However, both power elites and social forces are exposed to some specific great paradoxes.

The constitutional movement, which was drafted during the decline of the Qajar dynasty, as an immediate consequence of constitutionalism, is one of the turning points in the contemporary history of Iran. Despite the struggles of the constitutionalists, the output of the first Iranian constitution was to weaken the idea of monarchy and to pave the way for Reza Shah to gain power by creating an exceptional situation. The state of exception is a vacuum, indicating a kind of imbalance between politics and public and leverage rights. Whereby the holder of the monopoly of decision-making can concentrate power in his favor by removing legal obstacles and even the law itself. In such a situation, Reza Shah found the opportunity to gain the power. He had no legitimizing support to justify his monarchy, not only did he not turn his back on the constitution and abrogate it, but also, by stating his allegiance to the law, he sought to create an exceptional situation to cover the way for the suspension and consequent seizure of power. Thus, the question of this article is: Despite the constitution, how did the rise of Sardar Sepah to power from the Ministry of War to the monarchy go smoothly? It is hypothesized that Sardar Sepah, using the created emergency situation, Suspended the constitutionalizing of political. The method used in this research is descriptive-analytical based on historical data and the framework of Agamben's theory of exceptional situation.

 Nietzsche - the antecedent of critical philosophy - in his work, "on the genealogy of morality" said, the thing that is main problem of life for mankind, isn't suffering but that's the meaning of his pains. so, if we consider this frequent struggle to "find meaning" beyond ideologies and normative regimes of Truth as a center of critical philosophy discourse then, we will find that the critical philosophy has firm linkage with the resuscitation of "Truth", also in world that truth on one hand is victim in the wake of Values such as utility and fun, and one the other hand It has become a victim of violence and fundamentalism. It is clear that in this battle for truth, the thing that important isn't only founding of a "ontology of truth", but Drawing a "figure" that this theory of truth Bring to human relationships. A "figure" that reveals more than anywhere, in the form of politics. In this paper, we follow theoretical philosophers critical effort to rebuild the relationship between a "truth" in politics, through the theory of Giorgio Agamben, contemporary critical philosopher. Where Agamben is trying to get - through the anthropology and the theory of truth - apparatus or form for human relationships, that people aspire to truth lay in the creative and free from domination acts

After the occurrence of military coup in Turkey in July 2016 the president declared emergency situation. Emergency situation is the unbalanced situation between public law and political implication. Schmitt and Agamben as the theorist of state of emergency in the legal system have a different view about the situation. Schmitt believes that emergency situation is a paradoxical situation in which the ruler is outside the legal order and has the monopoly to take final decision. On the other hand Agamben also believes that emergency situation leads to exclusion of a number of citizens of their rights and putting them out of the legal order and this leads to more subjugation of the citizens. The article makes use of the theory of Schmitt and Agamben to explain the situation in Turkey. The main question raised is “What is the state of emergency in Turkish constitution?” Whether the Schmitt and Agamben theory can explain the coup and post-coup measures in the direction of increasing the power of government? The finding of the study shows that the coup in Turkey has become a tool for suppressing the opposition groups and it is meant to increase the power of the president. A measure which results to take away the rights of Turkish citizens; and dominating the political life of the country.