جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « امنیت فیزیکی » در نشریات گروه « علوم سیاسی »

The controversial Iranian Nuclear Program (INP) has attracted many eyes and thoughts for more than a decade. While much ink has been spilled on the evolution and impact of the INP on the international security and the Middle-Eastern politics, there has been a theoretical void in the explanation of its major driving force(s). Such an unfortunate poverty is no more obvious than in an analysis of the relation between Iran’s specific narrative of security and the INP. From this perspective, the present study is an attempt to explain major forces shaping Iranian leaders’ views towards national security and the INP. I will accomplish this mission by highlighting the interconnection of the INP and Iranian state identity as well as the priority of ‘Ontological’ security over ‘Physical’ security for Iranian leaders. In following, the paper touches central, yet ignored, concepts of ‘Shame’, ‘Face’, and ‘Reputation’ to illustrate motives behind the INP. Lastly, it traces the impact of ‘Master Frame of Trust’ on the trajectory of the INP.

This article is aimed at the study of reasons why Iran supports Hezbollah and what implications this will entail on various aspects of Islamic Republic of Iran's national security through the application of constructivist and neo-realistic point of view. Therefore, this study seeks to find an answer for this main inquiry why Islamic Republic of Iran supports Hezbollah of Lebanon? The hypothesis of this article is that Islamic Republic of Iran supports Hezbollah to provide different aspects of its security namely physical security and the security of its identity. Findings of this article using descriptive analysis implies that while it is necessary to apply these two theories to analyze the subject, with constructivist and neo-realistic theories, the influence on different aspects of security of identity and physical identity and influence by these two can be analyzed respectively.

This article examines efficiency of Intuitive Multi-Faceted Decision making Model focusing on sanctions of 1929 resolution of Security Council and the 9th and 10th government’s approach on nuclear program. Article 9 of resolution 1929 directly points to missile power of Iran، which has no record in previous resolutions. Author argues that Intuitive Multi-Faceted Decision making Model contrary to other conventional models based on rational actor is more compatible with multi-stage process of Iranian foreign policy.

Competition and cooperation have been dual dimensions of international relations throughout history. Competition directs attention toward the importance of the material capabilities. Cooperation, because of its character, leads focus toward the significance of the agent. According to the structural theory, security, as the most valuable good, originates in the context of order, in which the player enjoys a distinctive status. Distribution of capabilities has to occur in a way that brings about influence. With emphasis on the importance of identity of the agent in shaping the phenomenon and events, that kind of order ought to be created which demonstrates the least amount of identity conflict and inter-subjective similarity. An order of this kind brings about a promising domain for shaping security needs. Congenial international relations for each player assuredly depend on the possibility of making security. What is the most suitable framework to establish security is viewed as the main question of the article. Understanding the multidimensional character of security and knowing determining role of material and social aspects in shaping security, the hypothesis is: The environment with least identity conflict and highest status for the player creates the most suitable security surrounding without any doubt.