جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « اقلیت دینی » در نشریات گروه « علوم سیاسی »

According to the world view of Islam, a human being is a human being regardless of any kind of discrimination and privileges, and has inherent value and dignity, and belief in this progressive principle determines the type of attitude and treatment of religious minorities in Islamic societies. In today's era, which is known as the era of communication, the presence of religious minorities under different titles in Islamic societies is an undeniable fact and it is very painful, therefore, investigating what effect the belief in the principle of human dignity has on the way of dealing with the said minorities is one of the important goals. Research is leading. In the current research, we are trying to find an answer to this basic question that in validating the principle of dignity on how to deal with religious minorities in the political system of Islam, is the principle of dignity the priority or is it the dignity of minorities? And in case of priority of each one, this priority will be from which chapter? In this regard, the constitutions of three countries, Iran, Kuwait and Syria, which have a political system based on Islam and are required to comply with the rules and laws of Islam, were subjected to a comparative study regarding how to deal with religious minorities. One of the most important results is that according to the different types of religious minorities that are present in Islamic societies, the priority or delay of the principle of dignity over their being Mahdur al-Dam is different. Precedence is eternal in some cases and temporary in some cases. Also, compared to the constitutions of Kuwait and Syria, Iran's constitution has been more successful in dealing with religious minorities correctly, considering the principle of human dignity. The present research was done by the method of comparative analysis and using library tools.

Religious and ethnic minorities are one of the major concerns of the present age. Unfortunately, there is still discrimination, violence and injustice against this group of human society around the world. In the Islamic legal system, man has a special position and due to the inherent dignity that God has given him, regardless of race, gender, religion, geographical location, economic status, social status and rank, etc., has rights. Which must be respected and respected by members of society as well as the Islamic government. The study of the verses of the Holy Quran and the tradition and biography of the infallible leaders confirms this view and Islam has strictly forbidden oppression and aggression against others and declared it an unforgivable sin. Regarding the People of the Book, this special attention is paid and the Islamic government considers the rights and duties of this group of citizens to be formulated and enforced in the form of a contract of obligation.Some of the principles governing the relations of Muslims with non-Muslims in Islamic society are: the principle of human dignity, the principle of denying the domination of infidels over Muslims (denying the mustache), the principle of composing hearts, the principle of calling to Islam, the principle of benevolence, the principle of integration.

The movements of hostile countries and international assemblies and circles, mainly human rights, play role in the securitization of religious minorities and have exploited religious minorities as a tactic since the victory of the Islamic Revolution. The religious minorities recognized have played a unique role in consolidating stability and national unity and identity, that is why foreigners have focused all their efforts to promote their differences under the pretext of defending the rights of religious minorities. Then provide the grounds for the securitization of these minorities. Iran is consisting of different tribes, races, and religions that have formed a single nation under one flag and act correctly as a puzzle. If any of the pieces is moved, missing or disturbed, it will create an irreparable disturbance affecting the entire set. The religious minorities are among the puzzle of Great Iran.For the aforementioned reasons, the opponents of the Islamic Republic, from the oppositions and foreign countries, have emphasized on the issue of securitization of various minorities, especially religious minorities, in the country, by incitement or by appealing to international human rights assemblies. They have always been unsuccessful due to the efforts of legal religious minorities. This research seeks to make everyone aware of the alien's plans and provide a way to strengthen their integration. In this research, the library method and experts' opinions were used and the findings showed that despite countless efforts, the hostile countries did not achieve success.

At a time when foreigners are trying to forge division among various Iranian ethnic and religious communities, the current research work aims at delineating the reasons upon which all these different communities came under one umbrella to defend their motherland. This work, in addition to demonstrating the national compromise plan in Iran, will eventually try to neutralize some foreign conspiracies. In the beginning of the current research work, some key concepts, like religious faiths, sacred defense, and integration, are taken into consideration. Then it tries to portray the relation which exists between religious minorities and the government. This section will finally conclude that since the Iranian religious government is based on religious democracy, it can safeguard the rights of the minorities within the country and can even encourage them to do their outmost for the sake its sake. In studying integration between the followers of different religious faiths and other Iranians during Iran- Iraq war, the contributing factors are emphasized. Firstly patriotism and also being a true Iranian; and secondly, Imam Khomeini's especial way of tackling the rights of the minorities and the interactions that he stressed should exist among them which lead to a logical national compromise. The second point mentioned above is far above the rights of other religious faiths in the Iranian Constitution and it can be based on religious identity and the interaction between the followers of other religious faiths and the muslims.