جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « اکثریت » در نشریات گروه « علوم سیاسی »

Conflict between the will of the majority and that of the minority in an Islamic system of government can be conceived to occur in the basic social strata or in certain other social strata. If the conflict occurs in the basic social strata like the challenge to the legitimacy or the authority of the Islamic system itself, then both the institution of ‘leadership’ and the Islamic system are bound to withstand the challenge, no matter they are opposed by the majority or the minority. In regards to certain large scale issues, if the conflicts occur in basic or underlying levels, again the Islamic system should not retreat. However, if these kinds of conflicts and challenges do not do any harm to the Islamic system and the divine laws, one should show flexibility towards them.
Conflicts and contradictions can be conceived in large or small scale social strata and in relation to fundamental issues among groups, parties, councils, and, last but not least, among the minority and the majority. This research seeks to study the fiqhi (jurisprudential) solutions for the abovementioned challenges only in the basic social strata.

Liberal democratic theory of theoretical and practical problems associated with different and conflicting opinions and expectations is in these communities. Western societies in the last three centuries with the majority on the minority issue would have no choice but to sacrifice the interests of that minority criticized this approach has always been to Jean-Jacques Rousseau, where it is called soft dictatorship.
John Rawl's Theory of Justice to revive and save the liberalism of these criticisms to be raised. This article is intended to explain the fact that trying to restore liberalism of John Rawls's failed attempt.
In this article we will prove the Theory of Justice, Rawls based on neutrality on the status of the first is because the status of the base and the components of neutrality is not a theory of neutral and it therefore can not be based on no resolution to the problem of liberalism is. So trying to restore liberalism of John Rawls's failed attempt.