جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "تحلیل اقتصادی حقوق" در نشریات گروه "علوم سیاسی"

It seems necessary to pay attention to the nature, origin, goals and means of applying unilateral sanctions of the United States of America against Iran and evaluate it with the criteria of international rules extracted from international trade law documents and economic rules that governments are required to comply with. In this descriptive-analytical research, the legitimacy of America's cross-border sanctions has been examined from the perspective of international law. The results of the research show that according to the fundamental principles of general international law and the provisions of international documents of the United Nations system, the unilateral sanctions of the United States against Iran have no legal validity, and from the point of view of humanitarian needs, their moral legitimacy is also ruled out. The imposition of unilateral economic sanctions by the United States against Iran has caused severe economic pressures to be imposed on the Iranian people and the adverse effects related to indicators such as inflation, devaluation of the national currency, economic stagnation, reduction in purchasing power, restrictions on travel and trade, unemployment rate, etc. It will cause devastating damage especially to the middle class and vulnerable economic strata. Considering the unfavorable economic conditions and the economic crisis governing the livelihood of the Iranian people, the violation of their basic human rights, including the right to life, the right to health and hygiene, the right to a dignified life, the right to shelter, food and essential needs, the right to freedom of travel and trade,

Creating the right legal framework for achieving scientific growth and technological development and thus enhancing the well-being of society. Modernization of the invention of the industrial design is one of the long and distinguished features of the invention of the industrial design which should be considered as a form and subject. Today, the requirement to be a newcomer is both challenging and painful when it comes to industrial property litigation and litigation in litigation and infringement litigation. In Iranian law, both in the field of law and in the field of industrial property and in the judicial process, the issue of the invention of a new invention is very challenging, as in a considerable number of cases, as soon as the holder of the patent claims against the infringer, Filing a petition against the patent holder for "revocation of the patent for being new". In this study, we seek to analyze the condition of being a new legal entity while conducting an economic analysis to find the best rules that reduce these problems and challenges, reduce transaction costs, increase and improve the number and ease of transactions, and thereby increase profitability and social benefits. Let's edit.

In iran''s legal system، transaction subject is divided to specified original، in specified place and general، in an adjective and logical division and sanctions of specific performance، termination and contractual responsibility is predicted for it. Many of authors directly has implied to inefficiency of present form of sanctions without objection to above mentioned executions and suggested some strategies in order to modify this procedure. In this research، it is explained that the present state of the above mentioned sanctions is the natural result of formal division of transaction subject. On this basis، it seems that on appropriate analysis of transaction subject and replacement of economical view is a solution of raising practical and economical difficulties of this way of sanctions. Economical analysis of transaction indicate that material originals have not «ends in themselves» in transactions، but the subject of transactor commitment is accomplishment of «expected contractual position» of obligee. This position which has various components has material value independently in present common and it could be accomplished in various ways such as mentioned material original in contract and it''s substitute، thus transaction subject in no way appointed in special material original and specific performance will be subjectively negated، the contract is also execuble in various ways and there is no reson for breach of contract and resorting to termination. Furthermore، since the obligee has no right for obligation of obligor، he is charged to behave conventionaly and supposedly he could prevent damage or it''s increase through performing of transaction subject he should behave conventionally، unless he is in charge and is deprived of this part of damage.