جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "تعقیب کیفری" در نشریات گروه "علوم سیاسی"

The concept of "resistance" has been one of the main concepts of the foreign policy discourse of the Islamic Republic in the era after the victory of the Islamic Revolution; This concept refers to the negation of any order based on the dominance of Western and Eastern powers and the rejection of regional and international arrangements affected by the dominance system on the one hand and the attempt to redefine the regional and international status of nations and societies that are Dominion has been oppressed. For this reason, the axis of resistance, which is derived from Iran's military-security, diplomatic and cultural efforts in the countries of Lebanon, Syria and Iraq, has been one of the most important indicators of the country's foreign policy discourse in the last few years, especially in the fight against ISIS. Martyr Qassem Soleimani's managerial and security role as the most important commander of the resistance field made his position prominent in this discourse, and with his testimony, Iran's hostile approach towards the commanders and perpetrators of this terror was intensified. For this purpose, this article seeks to find the answer to this question, considering the position of Martyr Soleimani in the discourse of the axis of resistance, on what basis is his criminal pursuit in the international law system based? In response to this question, as a hypothesis, it should be said that the criminal prosecution of the perpetrators and commanders of Qassem Soleimani's martyrdom is based on the discourse of resistance and based on the approach of negating domination and weakening it in order to promote the discursive position of resistance. From this point of view, it should be said that the approach of this article was legal; Also, this article has been collected by descriptive and analytical method and its data is documented.

It is clear that the right to health as one of the fundamental human rights has been extremely important in all periods of history, especially with the development of countries and the emergence of modernity. Violation of health rights has irreparable consequences for the general public of a society and may even lead to a human disaster.  With the epidemic of the Covid-19 (Coronavirus) virus around the world and the need for timely vaccination, the importance of the right to health has been raised more than ever. One of these violations is the violation by government officials. The research method in this research is a combination of descriptive and analytical. The data of this research is collected through referring to documents, regulations, books, articles, and field study, in addition to that, it is set in the statement of the existing challenges with a critical approach in the light of presenting suggested solutions with the researcher's inferential analogy. In this research, the laws and regulations of the right to health in Iran's legal system and its violations, challenges, and approaches, we discuss the possibility of criminal prosecution of government officials as a group of people involved in violating the citizens' rights to health. The findings of the research show that there is a possibility of criminal prosecution of government officials in violation of the citizens' right to health, but there are many challenges on the way, which we will examine in detail and the available solutions.

Today, the countries supporting terrorism have been able to organize and implement their actions wherever they want, using modern technology and equipment. Examining terrorism and jurisprudential titles related to this term, along with their constituent elements, provides the means to compare these criminal behaviors. A comparison that, by identifying the commonalities and differences of these titles, can evaluate the method adopted in dealing with the action of the United States of America in martyring Sardar Soleimani. The questions that the current research is meant to answer are: From a jurisprudential-legal point of view, what criminal title applies to the action of the United States in relation to this crime? What does terrorism have to do with intentional murder? Which method (proceeding in domestic or international courts) is suitable for the legal case of assassination of Martyr Soleimani? The findings of the research show that despite the absence of a legal pillar of the phenomenon of terrorism in the domestic laws, if this behavior leads to intentional murder, it is unimpeded to impose punishment, including retribution, ransom, and general aspects, on the perpetrators by the domestic courts of the capital. which is discussed in this article with the method of descriptive-analytical study.

The foundations and principles governing criminal prosecution include structures and frameworks that explain what prosecution is and why it is justified. Undoubtedly, understanding the social and philosophical foundations of every human establishment is essential. Accordingly, the logical and social structures governing criminal prosecution are of special importance. The purpose of this investigation is to find out what and why criminal prosecution is based on, and is designed based on its strength or weakness. This is because, on the one hand, in order to properly understand the criminal prosecution and its accurate evaluation, it is necessary that the principles, goals and principles governing it have been carefully examined. On the other hand, in order to get familiar with the process of prosecution, different methods of prosecution in Iranian and Turkish law, prosecution by the court (predominant method in Turkey) and prosecution by the prosecutor (the only method in Iran) have been examined.