جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "تهدیدات نظامی" در نشریات گروه "علوم سیاسی"

The main mission of the Armed Forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran is to defend the independence and territorial integrity of the country, to guard the revolution and its achievements, and to counter military and security threats, And based on different factors and on the geographical context of the country are organized and established. Due to the vastness and diversity of the country's natural and human geography, the diversity of foreign threats, internal vulnerabilities and various missions of the armed forces, attention to land defense planning is one of the requirements of the country's defense.The main aim of this research is to "explain the components and characteristics of the military capability of land defense planning in the face of military threats" considering that this research produces the intellectual and theoretical foundations of land defense planning, The Kind of survey is practical-development, method of research is descriptive-analytical and gathering information method with use of library method and fishing (taking notes) tool, and field method with use of interview and questionnaire tools.In order to analyze the data, first by taking notes from library studies and interviewing experts, the components and characteristics of military capability effective in preparing the territorial defense against military threats were determined and Again, from the overlap of documents, interviews, and research literature, these components and characteristics were counted and Then, by distributing the questionnaire among the statistical population, the result was confirmed through a significant level with a 95% confidence interval and a 5% error. The results of this research show that 4 main components and 16 characteristics of military capability are effective in preparing the territorial defense against military threats. among the components listed, "maneuver space", "mission", "support" and "equipment, weapons and technology", respectively, have the greatest impact on the preparation of territorial defense against military threats

The purpose of environmental monitoring of issues is to increase cognition, facilitate and expedite their review and analysis. Given the breadth of the threat, various schools and security theorists discuss threats from different angles. Lack of proper understanding of future threats will lead to a lack of common language and more errors in analysis for defense decision makers. The knowledge-based defense approach is a tool to ensure the security of the country, using all the capabilities of knowledge defense. Using the capabilities of knowledge-based defense, it is possible to identify the threat and the threatened, the authority to deal with the threat and how to repel it by policy-making, development of guidelines and strategies. Therefore, the present article tries to identify the impulses and global trends affecting future military threats by environmental monitoring, and to express the importance of each from the perspective of knowledge-based defense. The present research is of applied-developmental type and in terms of method, descriptive-analytical. The sample size of this study includes 77 experts using stratified random sampling method. In this research, library and field methods have been used to collect information and closed interview and questionnaire tools have been used. The results of this study show that by using the capabilities and capabilities of knowledge-based defense components, it is possible to identify more future threats and provide a better platform to facilitate and expedite the review and analysis of threats to the country's defense system.

Enemies' capabilities, intentions, and actions to prevent their own successful achievement of national security interests and goals are threatened. Threats can be examined from different perspectives, the most common of which is the division of the dimensions of the threat, which are four dimensions: political, economic, social and military threat. Other divisions of the types of threats have been expressed by experts, including the division of Joseph Nye, who has divided the threats into two groups of hard and soft threats. The military threat is a traditional focus of national security concerns. Military threats are important because other threats also lead to this type of threat in acute situations. In this descriptive-analytical applied article, the research question is "What are the dimensions of internal and external threats and what is the position of military threats among the threats?" An attempt has been made to give a general explanation of the various dimensions of internal and external threats and the characteristics of military threats. In examining military threats, the military capability of the enemy must be examined both quantitatively and qualitatively. Modern military power does not depend on individual courage or significant reserves of readiness, but mainly on teamwork and other factors. Involved in combat power depends.

Following the unilateral abolition of the Joint Action Plan by Donald Trump, tensions between the Islamic Republic of Iran and the NeoCons reached their highest levels. Indeed, Trump considered the JCPOA as a tool for the growing development of the power of the Islamic Republic. Therefore, by imposing the most economic sanctions on the one hand, and considering the terrorists as the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps, publicly expressed his positions towards Iran. The full-fledged side of the war led to the expansion of the scope of the military conflict with the threat of deploying troops to the Gulf region. The main issue here is the nature and type of opposition between the Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States. Therefore, the authors' efforts in this paper are about providing answer to this question what is the main paradigm of deterring the Islamic Republic of Iran over US military threats? The author's hypothesis is based on the principle that military confrontation and direct between the two countries will not occur, and the findings of the paper, which are based on the theory of defensive realism and the use of synthetic methods of historical sociology and futures studies, indicate that for three major causes of this confrontation will not occur. At the national level, a deep coalition of military and official forces, including the army, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, the Parliament and the missile power Iran, At the regional level, the powerful Shiite coalition to support Iran and the fragile nature of the United States in the Middle East And internationally, the structural barriers of Russia and Trump's Narcissist personality are the most important obstacles to the realization of the US military strike against the Islamic Republic of Iran.

Passive defense as one of the two types of defense against enemy military actions and threats, paves the way for sustainable assets improvement of countries at the time of occurrence of threat. Residential buldings are among the important assets in the city, which must ensure the public safety and the experience of recent wars in the region suggests that residential areas are not protected against enemy aggression. The small increase in the urban settlements in the country is not consistent with the defense imperatives in this field and for this reason, this article aims to extract passive defense strategies developed in the field of residential buildings and to prioritize them. The main feature of this field of research is prioritizing strategies to help guide the executive planners in this field in defensive investments. In this cross-sectional study which has been conducted based on the descriptive- analytical method, initially, eight passive defense strategies in the design of residential buildings were extracted from library documents. Then these factors were ranked based on the field study and a questionnaire using Likert and AHP comparative methods measured by Cronbach′s Alpha, yielding respectively 906/0 and 966/0 through a sample composed of 32 experts. After ranking the results of both methods, they were compared and the results showed that the best defense strategy for sustainable architecture in urban residential buildings is using the safe space. After using the safe space, strengthening and positioning factors achieved the greatest scores.