جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "شادمان" در نشریات گروه "علوم سیاسی"

In the 1940s and 1950s, with the emergence of innovative writers and new styles, the establishment of social science institutions and new styles of philosophical and sociological prose, a new starting point was reached in the intellectual history of Iran. However, opposition to Orientalism and localism was widespread during this period, and the most important debates of the period revolved around their own centrality and that of the other. Many intellectuals were persuaded by Al-Ahmad, Shadman and Fardid, about a social disease that their predecessors thought was backward, but it was not, and it was mostly Westernized.So most of their efforts have been to leave the West. The study and evaluation of Iranian intellectualism in the tradition of Orientalism in the history of intellectualism in Iran was done; Its impact on the modern situation in Iran was also studied.So to answer the question of what directions the current of indigenous intellectuals in Iran has been drawn in their theory and what effect it has had on the modern situation in Iran ?! It is assumed that the current of indigenous intellectuals is based on principles such as belief in the Eastern past and its truth, examining the transgression of Westernization, emphasizing the past and ancient culture of Islam, as well as considering mysticism, faith, revelation and idols made. Insisted by the mind; As a result, it has led to anti-modernity in Iran. The research was conducted under the theories of Orientalism and modernity.

The emergence of new rationality and rise of civilization its surround, is the most impressive phenomenon in human history.Subsequently, the clash of this civilization with our historic world is the most important our contemporary issue. Iranian thinkers, before the Constitutional revolution so far, have their own perspective to the issue of "tradition and modernity" provided formulation its own. These thinkers were involved in a wide range, from opposition’s tradition to defenders modernity and from defenders of tradition to opposition’s modernity, as well as the "Middle thinkers". One of the pioneers of intellectuals opposed to imitate all of the West and advocated the revival of national identity, is sayed Fakhroddin shademan. Prior to the forties Shamsi thinkers such as Jalal Al-e Ahmad and Ali Shariati, the inevitable sense of modernity and awareness of passive away from it, to criticize the absolute modernism, and he says about the need to preserve national identity and historical capitals of Iran. So, his priority makes to necessary study his thought. This paper intends to base on Spragens Understanding of political thought and looks to take on Skinner to "the method" with an analysis of the most important works of shademan explain, his understanding of the problem "tradition and modernity", And then perform to critical evalution it and to reveal hidden insights in it, as well as its limitations.

The issue of "self" and who is "us" against the West is one of the major topics of interest to contemporary Iranian intellectuals. With reference to the works of intellectuals who have written about this subject area, it is clear that they have different views, each of the "tradition" a certain idea originated in the "self-Iran" sitting discussion.This article is the concept of "self" in terms of "tradition" nationalist thinking specifically of the votes of two contemporary Iranian thinkers, Fakhruddin Ahmed Kasrawī and Shadman manifested, are analyzed. Thus, the basic question that this paper should be formed in order to call it, is that the intellectuals "tradition" of thought above the idea of the concept of "self", and according to which social and theoretical backgrounds have the impression ?Article hypothesis is that the "old" nationalist intellectual intellectuals definition of the concept of "self" by reading the teachings of the intellectual and spiritual heritage "we" within Iran and the Persian language as the common forms and their stories of life "Iranian self" based on historical narratives Iran. The present paper is structured along two main axes.
In the first priority when considering life as well as the primacy of grace, to explain the ideas of Sayyid Ahmad Kasravi and the second axis Fakhroddin Shadman we have discussed ideas. Finally, to summarize the discussions and conclusions of the article is the question and hypothesis.