جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « صنعت خودروسازی » در نشریات گروه « علوم سیاسی »

The experiences of the new industrialized countries such as south Korea, Taiwan, Singapore, Malaysia in the process of industrialization , have highlighted the role of government in industrialization. But something that has been remained as a question and would be the subject for many researches is how to play that role for government.Confirming that there are many confusions about the role of government in development and industrialization in Iran ; the aim of  this article is to compare the role of government in Auto-industry in Iran and South Korea base on institutionalism approach and Evans’ pattern of developmental state (autonomy embedded in society) , and it uses the comparative method in order to find an answer for this core question : despite this fact that Iran and South Korea has established their Auto-industry almost in the same time , but why Korea has been much more succeeded than Iran in the world stand. Findings in the article has supported this hypothesis that the main reason for inefficient and backwardness of Auto-industry in Iran is unbalanced and heterogeneous roles of the government in Iran which are played in this sector of industry , in comparison to well-played developmental roles by south Korea’s government.

Indentifying the main factors of Irian’s Auto Industry faliure in competiion at global markets is the main aim of this paper. Evolutionary Institutional Theory and Historical Comparative Method are the theoretical framework and research method of this study. Statistical society includes all of the late comer automobile producers and statistical sample includes Iran, China and Mexico. The resulted data and comparative comparison shows that the conventional hypothesis (rent of oil incomes, lacking of comparative advantage at the time of establishing the industry, high tariff on Auto imprtaion at the first stage of industry and state ownership of the firms) are rejected and the hypothesis of inability of state in getting to sustainable high economic growth, re engineering the economic products through industrial policy and national/sectoral innovation system is confirmed. The last part of paper provides the conclusion and policy implications at three level of national, industry and firm.

As an international project, the Belt and Road Initiative includes strategic areas covering 65 countries. Given that Iran is at the heart of this road and China recognizes Iran as a strategic actor on this road, the type of policy the two countries have taken in relation to this initiative is crucial. In addition, economic activity has long been a central focus of Iran-China relations. The automotive industry is crucial to both countries as one of the driving forces of the growing economies. Iran's failed experience of working with Western companies as well as China's rapid progress in this area provides the potential for greater cooperation in this initiative. In this regard, this article attempts to answer some of the most important questions in this regard: What is the impact of Iran-China trade and investment on Iran's automobile industry? Will China's trade and investment in Iran put the development of the automobile industry in Iran at risk? Does China's influence on products and capital drive the automobile manufacturing industry in Iran? This article firstly studies the Iran-China trade relations within a one-way belt and explains why we have focused on the automotive industry. Then we will outline the main factors of China's foreign investment in the industry.

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of corporate social responsibility model with a combined approach. In the qualitative section, 20 experts and policy makers in the automotive industry in the field of corporate social responsibility participated in semi-structured interviews. After the interviews, the concepts were extracted from the interviews by Maxqda software and the relevant codes were extracted and the main and sub-themes were achieved by establishing a relationship between the extracted codes in the open coding stage and removing duplicate indicators and merging similar indicators. Based on the research results, the components of social responsibility, economic responsibility, environmental responsibility, ethical responsibility, humanitarian responsibility, legal responsibility, brand awareness, brand loyalty, perceived quality and brand association were selected as the central phenomena. The results also show that corporate social responsibility improves internal processes by creating managerial commitment and empowering employees. Improving organizational processes will also improve social and environmental considerations, responsible actions, and consumer support behaviors for the brand. These factors lead to sustainable growth and development of the company and ultimately lead to improved brand equity.