جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « نفوذ منطقه ای » در نشریات گروه « علوم سیاسی »

Despite the passage of more than four decades since the Iraq-Iran war, due to the effects that this war has had on geopolitics and regional order, and specifically on Iran's political-security approach and regional policy and its influence in the West Asian region, it is worthy of paying attention. Therefore, the question that arises is that how did the Iran-Iraq war affect the relations between Iran and Syria and the expansion of the regional influence of the Islamic Republic of Iran? Investigating the issue using the defensive neorealism approach, descriptive-analytical method and using library and documentary sources shows that this war made Iran's strategic loneliness and its unwanted isolation and lack of an ally in the region more obvious and the strategic proximity of Iran and Syria and The expansion of the scope of security cooperation between the two countries from Iraq to Lebanon and Palestine led to confrontation with the Zionist regime and it caused attention to regional influence and strategic deepening and countering security threats with the help of non-governmental allies in Iran's regional political-security approach. This ultimately led to an increase in political-ideological influence and strategic depth and regional deterrence power of Iran in West Asia.

The concept of middle power is used to explain the intermediate behavior, identity and foreign policy role of governments. Iran, as an emerging middle power, has both structural and behavioral elements to play such a role. The aim of the current research is to analyze the position of Iran in the categories of power within the framework of a combination of realism, behavioral and constructionist approaches and a new understanding of the regional middle power and then based on this analysis with a qualitative method and a descriptive-analytical approach to these questions should be answer why Iran's has decided to display its power and influence abroad, or what Iran's actions have been to achieve these goals, and what is the challenges or limitations of Iran's intermediate behavior at the level of the Middle East region? In response, this hypothesis is proposed that Iran's goal of expanding its regional influence is to ensure the survival of Iran, to fight against the influence and regional order of its opponents, including America and Israel, to support the resistance front, especially the Palestinians, to achieve to their own rights and exportation of Islamic revolution to the region in order to unify the Islamic world. The results of the research indicate that, although the Republic of Iran has expanded its power and influence in the region in appropriate historical opportunities; But for various reasons, ; It has many limitations and challenges to establish and expand its influence at the regional level and beyond.

Political dialogue and relations alone cannot give rise to political authority. Of course, dialogue is a necessary condition, but it is not enough. Political power is achieved when dialogue is accompanied by military power and deterrent power, and for this reason, military authority not only facilitates political dialogue, but also political power. The main purpose of this article is an approach to the relationship between military authority and negotiation in the opinion of the Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces. This article is an applied type of descriptive-analytical method and the sample size is 74 people. The method of collecting information is field and library, in which first the relevant statements of the Supreme Leader (30 sheets) were extracted as a dimension and were compiled and indexed through surveying and expert opinion, then based on Documentary and library studies of related materials (21 sheets) were extracted as a dimension and were compiled and indexed through surveying and expert opinion. According to the research findings, 12 factors express the approach of the relationship between military authority and negotiation in the mind of the Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces. These factors include: missile power; Military authority; Increase deterrent power; Regional power and influence; Progress and increase capability; God-centeredness and struggle in the way of God; Defensive authority; Esteghlal; Active, authoritative and effective presence; Adherence to principles and ideals; Movement power and convergence with jihadi groups of the Islamic Republic of Iran.

After the Arab uprisings, the UAE increasingly sought to play an effective role in regional power relations. Due to its geographical location and trade-based economy, it seeks to expand its political and military influence in various areas of the region. To legitimize these goals, Abu Dhabi put the policy of aligning with world powers on its agenda. To the extent that it pursued a policy of normalizing relations with Israel in order to confront its regional rivals and to overcome the economic consequences of its regional policies. Therefore, the main purpose of this article is to answer the question: what are the factors influencing the change in the foreign policy strategy of the UAE after the unrest in the Arab world?

In order to achieve the objectives of the research and answer the question, an attempt has been made to test the changes in the foreign policy of the United Arab Emirates by a descriptive-analytical method and using library resources.

The Arab revolutions and subsequent developments paved the way for a new wave of political transition in the region. The UAE faced a political transition in the region due to its conservative political structure. At this time, the country pursued a different foreign policy since independence. The failure of many Arab uprisings plunged the region into new crises, which provided an opportunity for the UAE to pursue its political goals in the region with an aggressive approach.

Although the UAE, with the support of the remnants of former regimes and secular nationalist parties, confronted the wave of post-Arab Spring political Islam and at some point sought an independent path of influence from allies such as the Saudis, the policy choice of the normalization of relations with the Zionist regime has created a context of widespread instability in the country's foreign policy.

After the 1979Islamic revolution and the establishment of the Islamic Republic in Iran, hostility between Iran andthe Zionist Regime has been created and escalated. As the imperatives of Tehran's anti-Israeli orientation, the alliance with Syria plus non-state groups in Lebanon and Palestine and gradually the formation of the Resistance Axis have been established. This paper aims to address this question: What is the impact of the Resistance Axis on the strategic depth of the Islamic Republic of Iran?

The method of research is descriptive-analytical by using library and internet sources.

The findings of this paper indicate that the Resistance Axis influence on Iran's strategic depth through mechanisms such as making balance of power by establishment of resistance basesand creating loyal groups, a strategic alliance with Syria and other non-state allies, improving Iran's missile capabilities, increasing the military power of Hezbollah, Hamas and Islamic Jihad, and weakening the deterrent capabilities of the Zionist Regime.

The formation and development of the Resistance Axis has expanded the Islamic Republic of Iran’s strategic depth in the Fertile Crescent region.

With the formation of the United Emirates in 1971, we are witnessing the efforts of this country to increase its regional power. In order to become a regional power, this country does not have the ability to compete with highly populated and territorially large countries, so it has tried to gain cooperation with major powers, strengthen its military power, territorial expansion and a more active presence in the West. Asia and North Africa to make up for their lack. In this article, the main question is what are the strategies of the United Arab Emirates to increase regional influence in West Asia and North Africa? And in response to the question, this hypothesis has been proposed that the United Arab Emirates is trying to increase its regional influence by building artificial islands, increasing purchases and creating military bases, conspiracy and military attack against countries.

"General definition of Iran" and the principles of confrontation with Iran is common to all the US governments. But there are some contrasts among them regarding the approaches, type of confrontation and intensity. Also the proportion of the threats posed by Iran comparing to other threats, is a matter of dispute. Understanding of these contrasts and dispute in order to design a mutual action is of the essence. The main differences in the attitude and position of the Tramp administration with previous ones are; removal of dealing approach with Iran, prioritizing the threats posed by Iran and Shitte over the threats posed by Sunni and the need for engaging with Shiites instead of Sunnis. Obvious evidence, of course, shows that the confrontation between the United States and Iran in the Trump era, as previous decades, will be subject to a long-term trend and numerous dimensions.

Saddam`s fall in 2003 and appearance of new political structure in Iraq prepared important opportunity for IRI to influence human societies, particularly Shi`ites and support ideals of IR in regional problems. Such been the case, the paper tries to explain the how of Iraq new changes` effect on Iran`s power and influence and answer the question: what may be considered as the effect of Iraq`s new political structure on IRI`s regional power? As is explained in the paper, following Saddam`s fall and Shiite state of becoming geopolitical, IRI and IR`s place, more particularly in political, social, media and cultural point of view, has been considerably ascended and, thereof, it been able to play better than before.

Expansion the Islamic Republic of Iran's influence in the Middle East and the conflicting interests of America with this country its and strategic ally, Israel, has caused the America sought to curb the regional influence Islamic Republic of Iran by multiple ways . Including ways to counter the influence of Iran is America's financial and military support of all current not in line with Iran's foreign policy and resistance axis That obvious example can be seen in its support of radical takfiri groups like Da'ish, Exacerbated gaps arising from differences between Shiite and Sunni, And separatism and support of military coalition against Iran that Supporting the formation of a Arabic joint army is among them.
Arabic countries especially the member of Persian Gulf Cooperation Council countries in recent decades has not formed so cohesive Arabic coalitions and alliances to be able to deal with future threats. Persian Gulf Cooperation Council countries led by Saudi Arabia in 2015 raised the idea of creating "Arabic joint army" in Sharm el-Sheikh. This paper seeks to explain the causes of the formation and support of the United States of America from the Union within the framework of the theory of offensive realism "strategy of reduction responsibility". And this paper wants to explain the challenges facing the Islamic Republic of Iran. Therefore the data of this research is that: the United States of America supports Arabic joint army financially and military in order to counter the influence of Iran in West Asia.