جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "compliance" در نشریات گروه "علوم سیاسی"

The implementation of any policy requires tools and means that must be anticipated within the policy itself to avoid specific problems in practice. Investigating the reasons for the failure of water resource management policies necessitates understanding the legislative process. Therefore, the question arises: Has the legislative process always been directed towards enforcing policies? To answer this question, the laws governing water resource management were analyzed using a network analysis approach, and the findings indicate that government policymaking in the realm of water resource management has relied on coercive tools, and the distinction between the mandatory obligations imposed on the government and the Ministry of Energy lacks a clear and technical rationale. Additionally, the use of terms such as organizations and related laws has led to ambiguity and various interpretations. Therefore, considering the ambiguity in the laws and the ineffectiveness of coercive policies, it is better for the government to strive to rewrite the laws with a collaborative approach and encourage a form of quasi-voluntary compliance in a collaborative environment.

Due to the authority of celebrities for the citizens,this group has been reflecting people's concerns through social networks in recent years in order to attract more fans and gain more credibility.However,reflecting the needs of the society on the part of the stars required meddling in matters outside their specialized field such as politics,economy and etc,and this created challenges and obstacles in the process of political development and in the process of democratization.The question is,what place have celebrities played in the political development of Iran after the Islamic Revolution?In response to the mentioned question,the hypothesis was raised that due to the influence of figures and the celebrity of politics in the Iran,this group can pose challenges in the process of political development.The purpose of this research is to show the position of artists in weakening the process of political development and celebritization of politics.The findings of the research indicate that the interventions of artists in various political-social issues may bring positive and superficial results in the future,but ultimately it will lead to results that will disrupt the process of political development and democratization.This article is presented with reference to documents and library resources and qualitative method of analytical-descriptive type.

The main question of the present study is why do governments adhere to global norms? In this study, using descriptive-analytical method, the authors examine the adherence of the Islamic Republic of Iran and Saudi Arabia to global norms by using three explanatory variables of legitimacy between domestic and foreign norms. International countries have reviewed. Findings show that among the explanatory variables affecting the Islamic Republic of Iran's exposure to global norms, the variable of proportionality between domestic and foreign norms has the greatest impact on Iran's acceptance or non-acceptance of global norms and the other two variables are legitimizing the frameworks of world order. And the consequences of how to face the norms for the international image of the country are influential in the next level and all three act as obstacles to the acceptance of international norms due to the special situation of the Islamic Republic of Iran rather than facilitating the acceptance of international norms. . On the other hand, in the case of Saudi Arabia, the variable of proportionality between domestic and foreign norms can potentially play a role of undermining global norms, but the other two variables, legitimizing the framework of world order and the consequences of how to deal with norms, facilitate the international image of the country. They are very effective and pave the way for the acceptance of global norms for Saudi Arabia.

A key important factor in Muslim countries and in relation to public domain, especially with regards to democracy is religious scholars’ viewpoints. Their jurisprudential perceptions which are based on Islamic resources (the Quran and narrations form the Prophet) and influenced by contextual elements such as time and geography have resulted in a wide spectrum of various and even contradictory positions. Given this, different questions arise about origins of legitimacy, compliance and political participation, e.g. how does Islam compromise with republicanism? And also; in an Islamic society the ruler is people’s representative who is appointed by them to govern the society on their behalf or he has custodianship over people? On what basis does an Islamic political system gain its legitimacy; people’s vote or religious authorities? And finally, what relationship does exist between people’s vote and the Guardianship of an Islamic Jurist or Wilayate Faqih? Some Shia-Muslim scholars in answering the above questions believe that the religious political authority is only for the prophet Muhammad and his infallible successors (P.B.U.T) and there is no such a right for anyone else. They restrict a faqih’s social-political authority only to the area which is known as Hesbiyah affairs in the Islamic literature. In contrast, those scholars who believe in the same authority with the prophet for the jurists have created three different discourses in this field. First: An Islamic political system obtains its legitimacy from the law of sharia and therefore people has no interference or contribution in this ground (the appointing theory or the law of sharia). Second: People freely and in accordance with collective wisdom choose an ئIslamic system to govern them (the representative theory). Third: those Islamic laws accepted by majority of Muslims is the basis of legitimacy in an Islamic political system (state-Imamat theory). In other words, the third discourse with differentiating between legitimacy and compliance stress on this fact that an Islamic political system will be actualized only if people’s vote meet with the law of sharia. According to this jurisprudential verdict, while the custodianship aspect of a ruler (wilayat) receives its legitimacy from the sharia- that is similar to the appointing theory- but it is the public vote that makes applicable the custodianship in the social-political arena; like the representative theory.

This paper aims to investigate Turkey’s compliance with European Union energy rules and policies.  European Union encourages and reinforces member states and candidate countries to compliance with its rules and policies by normative and monitoring structures. Because of European Union’s sensitive situation in energy sector, candidate countries compliance with EU energy policies, is one of the most important requirements for the country’s accession to the Europe Union. It seems that Turkey in its accession process, have been significant advances in compliance with EU rules and policies in the sectors of energy supply security; internal market; energy efficiency; renewable energy sources and transnational networks. To test this hypothesis, the author tries to utilize Compliance literature and investigate the Turkey’s compliance with European Union energy rules and policies from the perspective of annual progress reports of EU and focus on different sectors of the country’s energy.