جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "financial services" در نشریات گروه "علوم سیاسی"

The present study aimed to design a qualitative model of cooperation strategies in financial service supply chains. This research was descriptive in terms of data collection method and qualitative in terms of implementation method. In the qualitative section, using the content analysis approach, the dimensions and components of cooperation strategies in the supply chain were identified and the researcher designed a qualitative model of the cooperation strategies model using the qualitative method based on the components of vision theory. Identified cooperation strategy based on 5-component vision theory Sensitivity reduction (sub-criteria: participation of financing service providers, technical expertise of financing service providers, flexibility of financing service providers), profit expansion (sub-criteria: directing financing management, supervision and control, optimal contract management), avoidance Loss (sub-criteria: investment facilitation, financial allocation, cost management), probability coefficient (sub-criteria: understanding target customers and meeting their expectations, mutual trust between financing service providers and financing agents, relationship quality) and reference dependence (Sub-criteria: attracting partner support policies, analyzing competitors' activities, research and development in the field of financial services success).

Serious and sensitive tasks of security organizations require to use capable and efficient employees. The capability, productivity and motivation of these employees depend on the proper compensation of their service. Due to resource constraints, compensation for these services requires identifying solutions for compensating services and prioritizing it. Accordingly, the purpose of this study is to identify and prioritize employee compensation strategies.

The present study is an applied qualitative research and has been done by the classical Delphi method. The statistical population of the study includes the staff of one of the security institutions of Qom province. Purposeful sampling method and sample size in this study is 15 people, which was done in four stages: interview and questionnaire. Research data were analyzed using descriptive means and correlation tests on contextual variables.

39 strategies for compensating employees’ services were obtained through interviews with experts and theory studies in ten priorities. In the third phase of Delphi, 28 jobs were identified in five priorities, and in the fourth phase of Delphi, twenty-one solutions were evaluated in three priorities. The solutions were divided into two categories: financial and non-financial. Financial solutions have a higher average than non-financial solutions and among financial solutions, compensation for indirect and direct cash services have a higher priority. Reducing the retirement age is the most important indirect solution and increasing the quantity and quality of overtime and low-interest loans is the most important direct financial solution. Among the non-financial priorities, job factors have a higher average than organizational factors, and the most important strategy in this category is to promote the job position and service category coefficient.

Securities regulators around the world are examining the extent to which digital currency activities and platforms are within the scope of their jurisdiction. Most regulators take the position that the extent of their oversight authority is entirely dependent on the actual functional activities of the digital currency system operations. In some jurisdictions, digital currency operations deemed to be electronic services or financial product offerings are subject to oversight. Key participants in the virtual currency community, such as Overstock.com and LedgerX, are increasingly taking the position that they will pursue full compliance with existing regulatory requirements to the extent that their digital currency operations fall within the scope of existing regulation. This approach is prudent and likely to facilitate growth of the virtual currency market. The approach does, however, require extensive legal compliance activity.

National authorities regulating currency generally do not have direct jurisdiction over virtual currencies, to date, as they are not national fiat currencies. However, currency regulators are influencing development of digital currency in several key indirect ways. Through their authority to protect the value and integrity of national fiat currencies, they take actions affecting digital currencies claiming that such actions are necessary to protect their national currency. Additionally, as these regulators generally have the authority to control the activities of banks and other key financial institutions, they influence digital currency development and use by restricting the ability of those institutions to use or accept virtual currency. Currency regulators commonly have jurisdiction over conversion of foreign currency, and through this role, they now routinely restrict the ability of parties to conduct conversions between digital currencies and traditional national currencies. National currency regulators have also issued substantial warnings to consumers of the risks associated with digital currency use. Currency regulators often have authority over funds transmission and money transfers, and they frequently exercise that jurisdiction in the context of virtual currency use. Some government are now exploring the possibility of government controlled digital currency and of government participation in the blockchain of existing virtual currency platforms.