جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "fukuyama" در نشریات گروه "علوم سیاسی"

To investigate the concept of social identity and then the postmodern concept of identity politics and to criticize Fukuyama's approach in examining Wanting Islam based on the concept of identity politics, so that one can understand the correct perspective of this concept in Islam. This research has been written using theoretical sources and rereading and analyzing them, and its method is a case library on the subject of identity and politics. The concept of identity politics has recently received attention in the field of political and social thought in the West, and since this concept arose from the reality of the social identity of religious groups, especially Wanting Islam in Western societies, it was necessary to consider the concept of social identity as a driver of the thought of the effects of identity. Check on the policy. It has indicators such as similarity and difference, individual and collective identity, group identity and dialectic inside and outside, dynamic and fluidity of identity in the process of social identity production and reproduction. And issues such as identification and meaningfulness, predictability and the issue of confirmation and dignity are effective in the concept of identity politics. The indicator of this concept in the modern period is the issue of approval and seeking dignity to be recognized, and Wanting Islam is considered one of its examples. The theoretical challenge of research with Fukuyama's approach is to identity politics and the issue of Wanting Islam. The issues of the effects of politics and identity mutually, criticism of Fukuyama's analysis of modern Wanting Islam with his views on liberal democracy, as well as the issue of the legitimacy of religious law and considering the social unit of the Ummah are the main results of the research.

The decline in the United States began when the United States sought to secure US national interests in a unipolar system and to eliminate the bipolar system by upsetting the balance of power in the world. This study seeks to answer this question if there has been a decline in American hegemony and what are the characteristics of this decline?Using descriptive-analytical method, this study seeks to answer these questions: first, what is the exact meaning and nature of the decline of American hegemony and why and how did this decline occur? Secondly, how would it be be the situation of the world system during the decline of American hegemony? The main hypothesis of this study is that the decline of United States began after the collapse of the Soviet Union and the world system quickly descended from a unipolar to a multipolar world. Although this research is based on the theories of Fukuyama and Huntington, but the theories of other Western thinkers have also been used to answer the questions of this article.

The present article is an attempt to understand how the transition to governance in political theory and analysis of its theoretical approaches occurs. Given that over the past four decades there have been significant changes in the face of power at the level of the political system and the performance of governments, so debates about the decline of government power and the emergence of various political and political actors and changes in governance as one of the main issues in the new era. Therefore, the present article is aimed at answering the fundamental question of what approach has contemporary political thought taken to the nature of the transition from government policy? In answer to this question, two possibilities of theoretical controversy are examined: The first view, or the mainstream of political thought, views the transition from government to governance, and in contrast to the critical current (the second view), doubts the positive approach of the mainstream from the different and emerging role of power here called governance. The present article expresses the views of their thinkers and explains the different dimensions of this debate by stating three theoretical approaches related to the transition in the way of governing and analyzing the three levels of government, governance and governance

Social capital is an interdisciplinary concept that has emerged since Marx, and especially in the second half of the twentieth century, in a variety of disciplines alongside,economic, cultural, and symbolic capital. This concept refers to the connections and connections of the members of a network, which leads to the realization of collective goals by creating norms and mutual trust. Among the political scientists of Putnam and Fukuyama, they have paid more attention to this concept in their important works. The question that this article seeks to answer is what are the similarities and differences between Putnam and Fukuyama's approach to social capital? The results of the research, which is done by a comparative method of "very similar" approach, try to highlight the differences and distinctions between the texts and components of the theories of these two thinkers. In order to obtain the theoretical literature on the subject and data, library studies have been used in terms of the originality and validity of the documents, and in order to extract views and formulate theoretical foundations, the analysis and adaptation of qualitative content of texts has been used. The findings show that the similarity of the two theorists in emphasizing the constituent links of social capital is the norms of mutual trust and cooperation, but while Putnam emphasizes civic traditions and the political and social nature of social capital, Fukuyama focuses more on informal norms, individual, group and organizational levels. And the economic and social structure of this capital pays attention

The end of history from the historical, political, and philosophical perspective is a great deal of reflection and review. Fukuyama in his own political doctrine all the modern features that in fact, the cause of deterioration and the decline of the west's civilization would be counts as a tool for the durability and continuity of capitalist survival. He tries to use forced to postpone this end and by drawing a figure from this end, instead of worrying, creates hope and mobility. During the year 1989, Francis Fukuyama to be original liberal democracy as an economic political thought in North America and Western Europe published the theory of the end of history in an article. This research is dedicated to explain and review the basics and the origin of the thought of Francis Fukuyama to do this, was use from descriptive-analytical method and compiled its data in a library method. Finding of the research suggests that the intellectual roots of the end of Fukuyama's history retrieved from the Hegelian dialectic. Fukuyama's The End of history based on the ideology of liberal democracy and is trying in reinforcement and its consolidation in the global system. Hegel knows this primary stimulus of history in the human factor that indeed be a fight for recognition