جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « islamist discourse » در نشریات گروه « علوم سیاسی »

Political socialization is one of the most important goals of political currents. According to the author, the Islamic Revolution of Iran, by presenting its special discourse, was able to follow the process of political socialization in Iranian society and expand it. In fact, the main question of the research is: how and in what way was the Islamic Revolution of Iran able to pursue this process of political socialization? The hypothesis raised by the author in response to the question is as follows: Through political orthography in Iranian society and knowledge of the centers of power, it is possible to explain how political socialization during the Islamic Revolution. In fact, it should be said that the innovation of the current research is in explaining the process of political socialization in Iranian society through the flow of the Islamic Revolution. In this research, Islamic political discourse has been used as a theoretical framework of the research and the data have been analyzed using the method of historical sociology.

The ambiguity of the research is that despite of the hegemony of Islamic Hijab since mid-1358 Hijri, In particular, by removing the discourse of secularism (and the idea of its notion of Hijab), and the hegemony of the discourse of Islamism (as the only existing discourse that could dominate its notion of Hijab without rival), since the 1360 Hijri, the issue of Hijab have still been exist. The question is that: "How and why was the issue of Hijab created in the Islamic Republic of Iran?" The present study, by using a descriptive-analytical method, has tested the hypothesis that “the issue of Hijab has resulted in the different readings of the subdivisions of Islamist discourse (the discourses of war, Sazandegi State`s Discourse, reformism, and Principlism) that based on their discursive space from the notion of Islamic hijab ( The extent of the Hijab (maximal and minimal Hijab) and the d

After 50 years of hegemony of The Mubarak authoritarian discourse in Egypt, the people of this country were able to challenge the hegemony of authoritarian discourse. With the fall of the Mubarak regime, the Muslim Brotherhood Seized power. A year after That Muslim Brotherhood coming to power, the group, due to the Incompetence in accordance with the political and economic conditions, Lack of charismatic leadership, Inability to retain key institutions of the Community and Practical action conflicting with the principles of Islamism discourse, so defeated in the Egypt political arena In the revolutionary movement (2011-2013). As a result of these factors, The context was provided for the emergence of rival discourse though the coup. The main question in this article is: what caused the Islamist discourse of Muslim Brotherhood failed And what causes the re-emergence of secular discourse? The hypothesis here is that Muslim Brotherhood Failed to articulate a comprehensive discourse And gradually provide The conditions for the return of secular discourse. In this article, the meaning constellation of Laclau and Mouffe's and Teun Adrianus van Dijk discourse theory have been used as the research method.