جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « j street » در نشریات گروه « علوم سیاسی »

Regarding the encounter between American political and strategic institutions and Iran over the nuclear issues and capabilities of the Islamic Republic of Iran, a wide range of actors and influential political forces are involved, all aiming to reduce Iran’s nuclear capabilities. These include the US Congress, advocacy groups, Israel-affiliated lobbyists, and research centers, each working to diminish Iran’s nuclear position and capabilities. American security and strategic institutions seek to present Iran’s nuclear power as a threat to the United States, using this perception to justify increasing pressures. This study examines the social politics and institutional patterns of the United States in restricting Iran’s nuclear power. To explain the issue, we utilize James Rosenau’s pre-theoretical approach known as structural and social affiliation theory. Using a descriptive-analytical method, this research argues that American political and strategic institutions act as security overseers for the US, employing complementary mechanisms to identify and restrict Iran’s nuclear capabilities. We conclude that US strategic institutions are influenced by Zionist lobbyists, which aim to affect Iran’s political structure and public institutions, thereby minimizing Iran’s influence in its surrounding regions.

The high and main streets of the city are the heart of cities nowadays. Today, these vital arteries are facing new social, environmental and economic challenges and must deal with the uncertainty of the city. Now the important question is how to design and plan the main streets of the city in such a way that it meets the different expectations of society and at the same time, it can be compatible with future developments. Many planners and urban designers in the world are thinking of creating strategies to restore the role of high streets to their original position as a place to serve visitors, businesses and stakeholders that all people can use. The high streets for all approach is a popular approach in urban studies in recent years. Nevertheless, so far, it has not been mentioned in the research field of Persian texts and sources in the specialized field of urban planning. Although this approach is successful in global experiences. The purpose of this research is to look at the function of the street by presenting a conceptual model of the high streets. In addition, to validate and better introduce this new approach, two critical streets of Tabriz City (Imam Khomeini Street and Foroughi Street) have been compared from the perspective of this approach. The general approach of this research is descriptive-analytical. Collecting information and field data through a questionnaire and the sample size based on Cochran's formula is 384 people. The research findings show that the essential components of the "High Street for All" approach are more vital in Imam Khomeini Street than in Foroughi Street, and only Foroughi Street has a higher priority in the two indicators of "personal branding, presence of famous commercial brands." To create a High Street for all streets, it should be a strength at the comprehensive level of spaces in all dimensions, including the relationship between humans and the environment.

Wall Street Movement represents the people''s protest about the function of capitalist system، and can be considered as one of the most important events and changes of American society in 2011. It is important because unlike other movements، it is not limited to a certain area and could gradually travel to other parts of the world. This paper، adopting a descriptive-analytical method، studies the reasons for Wall Street movement to happen based on Habermas theory. This study first examines new social movements and Wall Street movement descriptively and then، attempts to analyze the reasons responsible for the formation of Wall Street movement analytically based on Habermas theory. Findings of this research show that American society is witnessing different crises of capitalism، mentioned by Habermas. Therefore، it can be said that the crises in the various fields of economic، politics، and public domain in the U. S. A led to fuel Wall Street''s movement

Wall Street movement changes and protests hase some special feature from beginning, that regarding this changes is very importance in every explanation. When we talke about this movement, it means changes and turns that happened in idedogies for struggle and expression public opinion.some feature of this movement are: muster of protesters in wall street as a symbol of eapitalism, vich, and power, extending the scope of protests to other region of U.S emphesis of people to graspe a model from Islamic uprising in Arabiancountries, shifting economical protests to eontrast with eapitalism system under the banner of "99 rule" precent versus "1 percent",uniting all people of U.S instead states people the maine question of this article is: with regarding roots and aspects of wall street movements, what will be the perspective and consequence of this movement. the answer is: wall street movement will have internal and external consequences, thas this out comes will have some disquieting for U.S to best answer to maine question of this research, we will stady wall street movement in a theoretical frame worke, then we will stady the nature and aspects of this crisis frome the view pointe of "Noam chamsky".finaly the conclution of atical hase been forwarded. the methodology of this research is descriptive-explanation.

Occupy Wall Street was a flag which went to the hands of the American protestors. This flag reflected the simulation of Occupy Wall Street to the occupation of Palestine and the main reference of the protest was aimed at Zionism. The deep roots of this occupation dates back to the occupation of the American Natives’ territories and in fact the same American monopoly in the path of American history in various fields including the US economic and financial system has been reflected. The main question of this paper is why Occupy Wall Street movement emerged as a serious social movement in America. In response to this question, it is discussed that the one percent American society that is a symbol of the minority exclusivism over the majority, is caught in exceptionism in three levels of epistemic, program and institutional. American people’s protest was not merely against the economic situation but against the “exceptionist social system”. This American exceptionism has created a crisis for the ruling majority. This means the realization of minority instead of democracy and in a more accurate interpretation “democracy crisis”. In this paper, various aspects of epistemic, program and institutional exceptionism joined by the Occupy Wall Street movement will be explained.

Discerning social movements is accomplished on the basis of their dialogue typology. The language used will lead into a discernment of those movements. Nature and function of social movements is based on the definition they give of themselves. Such a condition is witnessed in Wall Street social movement; a movement that contain social and economic signs, has been a source of economic protests in various historical eras and is regarded a symbol of social movement in September and October 2011, formed on the basis of economic demands. The issue can be brought up here that in current era, social movements enjoy a comprehensive and multi dimensional nature. Therefore, it is natural that such movements leave behind different consequences. The Wall Street movement can be regarded as a reaction to the model that is based on the global governance. Although globalization has been developing since the early 1990's, its consequences can be witnessed two decades after the time that "Fokoyama" declared as inevitable the era ofLiberal Democracy's victory over the rival ideologies. Wall Street movement sends the message that globalization of economics will not only be threatening for the developing countries, but its consequences can jeopardize the lower social group's status in the capitalist world. Wall Street movement can be known as a reaction to Milton Friedman's economic Neoliberalism. Friedman tried to determine the transition through a financial crisis in a capitalist system via therole of multi-national companies in organizing regional markets. Based on his approach the stage was set for the formation of a process that is related to the global governance, globalization of economy, and globalization of politics.

The Wall street movements began in Zakaty park at side the America capitalism center. After several mounts were extended and transmitted to another cities of America and Europa. Although anticapitalism movements appeared in Ciattel and Davoos before, but recent protests, named %99 or Wallstreet movement, extended widly and were astonish politicians. So mooted this question: if great revolution appeare in capitalism system? And what are the nature and traits? For answer this question used information and reports from mass media. Results indicate that the protest model of Wallstreet is smooth.Protesters deployed in parks and streets near the America capitalism symbols. This movements isn’t destructer, but is public protest to discrimination and,unjustic and economic crises from Neoliberalism in America and Europa.