جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « muslim thinkers » در نشریات گروه « علوم سیاسی »

In the Modernization process, Muslim societies face many problems that sometimes appear in political form, sometimes in economic form, sometimes in social form. The huge volume of these problems has not only delayed the development process, but even stopped it and caused cycles of corruption and crisis of legitimacy. A group of Muslim thinkers believe that most of these problems have cultural-civilizational roots, i.e., the passage of time will not change the nature of these problems. We are still dealing with the intellectual problems that the Muslims faced a few centuries ago. As a result, Muslim thinkers prioritize the theories that use the internal possibilities of culture to solve these problems. This article, using library sources and employing descriptive-analytical method, is an attempt to find answer to the following question: How Muslim thinkers use "tradition" for development. According to these thinkers, the tradition still provides us with the most important facilitating ideas; the ideas that are compatible with the characteristics of the Muslim communities and are away from the simplifying West-oriented or East-oriented theories.

There is a lot of talk about why states and civilizations arise and how they arise in the political opinions of Muslim thinkers, because on the one hand, the central sign of political thought is the analysis of the existing situation and the explanation of the desired situation, on the other hand, the critical situation of many of the period The historical events of the past of the Muslims intensified the desire for an ideal state. Therefore, talking about the decline and survival of the state and civilization is not a new thing, but the question of why the decline and survival of a civilization by applying Spriggan's method of analysis is a new issue because in this Method 1. An image of the crisis, issue and problem that the Islamic state and civilization often faced is presented. 2. The causes and reasons of this crisis and problem are examined in the opinions of Muslim thinkers. 3. The desirable state or the ideal civilization society is mentioned in the eyes of Muslim thinkers. 4. Finally, the ways of obtaining and achieving that civilized society are examined. The findings of the research emphasize that: depressed nervousness is one of the issues of civilization. The lack of justice intertwined with peace is one of the causes of the civilizational crisis. Al-Farabi's utopia and Ibn Sina's righteous Medina are examples of a desirable civilized society. The way to achieve such a society.. leadership and the creation of a new social order.

The issue of thinking about the pattern of development in Islamic countries has always been one of the intellectual concerns of Muslim thinkers and politicians, and each of them, in accordance with their ecological characteristics as well as the way of looking at progress and religion, have reproduced a local pattern of progress. The construction of various models of progress has led to the Islamic world. This research with a descriptive-comparative method and with the aim of examining the differences and differentiation of development-oriented thinking patterns in leading Islamic countries, tries to compare these patterns based on 5 components: "Attitude toward progress", "Attitude towards religion", "Fundamentals" Religious Pattern of Progress "," Examples of Religion in the Field of Progress "and" The role of atmosphere on the Pattern of Progress "in Iran, Turkey and Malaysia and answer the question that the approach to progress and its relationship with religion in thought-oriented progress What are the differences and similarities between the three countries?The findings of this study indicate that, first, the patterns of thinking about progress under the influence of indigenous religions and traditions have introduced a range of patterns of indigenous Islamic progress among the thinkers of those countries, and second, despite some fundamental differences, these patterns Approaches to religion and progress are approaching each other and all are seeking a selective benefit from the manifestations of progress and Western civilization and modernity focused on their native conditions and are repeating common experiences in various political, economic and social fields.

The purpose of the present study was to study the theoretical dimensions of the challenges posed in the aftermath of the Ottoman caliphate in 1924, and provide a typology of different types of ideas about Islamic caliphate in three forms—“traditionalist, modernist, and modernist”. In this regard, the political ideas of the most prominent representatives of each of the spheres namely Rashid Reza, Hassan al-Banna, and Ali Abd Al-Raziq, concerning politics and caliphate, were studied. The research method was descriptive-analytical, and the data were gathered in library fashion. The results indicated that Muslim thinkers’ viewpoints are at odds over the question of “caliphate”. Thinkers generally find themselves on common ground on the idea that caliphate in the Muslim world is a form of state for the protection of the laws of Sharia. Traditionalists and modernists argue that human problems can be solved by referring to the holy texts, but Ali Abd Al-Raziq argues for the ability of human mind in making sense of the world and managing personal and collective affairs in life. In this regard, there is a consensus between him and modernists like Hassan al-Banna. Modernists mostly vouch for the separation of state from religion and the theory of world-centrism. The consensus on the idea of the need for the involvement of religion in politics has led the two schools, traditionalist and modernist, to consider the need for reviving caliphate. The two intellectual orientations, traditionalist and modernist, believe that the unity between Muslims is the essential condition for caliphate.

The sociopolitical conditions of the Muslim World took shape in the Medieval Ages when security became the main concept in the justification of overcoming and domination politics. In this period, various schools of thought appeared due to sociopolitical requirements which shared the idea of justifying absolute government according to the concept of security and necessity of removing anarchy. Such conception of politics and government became so extreme that the main principles emphasized by Islam in politics such as justice, equality, and morality were fully marginalized. In this article, examining the grounds and causes of this situation, major characteristics of dominant perception of security are explored and the opinions of a number of thinkers like Imam Moahmmad Ghazzali, Ibn Valid Tartoushi and Khajeh Nazam ul-Mulk are analyzed. As the author argues, the Islamic though in the Middle Ages gave absolute authority to Sultan in order to establish order either in the framework of Siasat-Nameh or Shariat-Nameh. It considered the preservation of religion as an important aspect of establishing security as possible through this authority. Therefore, although Sultan was not legitimate according the religious texts, the Ulema obliged people to obey him for the sake of preservation of religion.