جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "shura" در نشریات گروه "علوم سیاسی"

The issue of guiding man and bringing him to happiness has been one of the goals of divine prophets; This is the basis of the call to monotheism, prophethood and the introduction of the next prophet in divine religions and Imamate in Islam, resurrection, their tidings and warnings to realize this goal and great ideal. He sent the perfect man to lead mankind to happiness and perfection and placed him as his guardian on earth and this path was current in all religions until he reached the religion of Islam and with the end of prophethood, the imamate continued the goal of the prophets for the happiness of man. and reason dictates that the successors of the divine ambassadors should be the people most similar to them, who were appointed as successors based on the Shia view, the twelve imams, and in the age of occult jurisprudence, based on reason and religious texts. In contrast to the opinion of the Sunnis, they believed in the theory of election, that they believed in the Shura for election. Mr. Shamsuddin is one of those who accepted this opinion and cited the verses of the Shura to prove it. Emphasis on the thoughts of Imam Khomeini (RA) has examined the implications of his evidence and the legal authority in the age of occultation using the opinions of Imam Khomeini (RA) has proved that he also rejected the Shura theory and at the same time did not ignore

The purpose of this study is to investigate the validity of the council in fatwas and rulings. For this purpose, to show the validity of the council in the fatwa and ruling, various rational and narrative reasons have been cited, with a descriptive-analytical method. These reasons are: "The rule of reason to make the result of the council more convincing", "Quranic verses", "Narrations" and "The way of the wise". "Commitment to the object and commitment to its accessories", "Rational rule of preference over the preferred", "The basis of order in the age of absence", "Society's guardianship over the individual", "Collective agreement on the validity of the majority vote" and "Avoiding discord and division". One of the reasons for proving the validity is the majority vote that have been discussed in this study.From all the rational and narrative reasons, it can be concluded that the council is valid in a wide area and following the opinion of the council of experts is not only valid, but in many cases it is preferable to the opinion of the expert. There is no problem with the inclusion of the reasons for the validity of the council in relation to the fatwa and the judicial or provincial ruling, unless the reasons for the validity of the fatwa or the judicial ruling and the provincial ruling require otherwise.

The Syrian Islamic scholar Muhammad Rashid Rida is known as an Islamic reformer among the contemporary thinkers of the Muslim world. By appealing to the Quranic verses of the Shura, he proposes a council government to adapt the Islamic caliphate to democracy and to remove the caliph from tyranny. Hi follows an elitist approach while talking on Shura. Facing with obstacles to establish Islamic Caliphate, Rashid Reza tends towards theorizing of Islamic government. The importance of this research is that it both seeks to examine Rashid Reza's views on Shura from various aspects and its adaptation also to democracy and study its political consequences. However, the main questions is that "what place does Shura have in Islamic government in Muhammad Rashid Rida's thoughts and what are its political implications?" In this the Stuart Hughe's Interactive Method is used. In this method there is a significant role between the requirements and the social contexts in the formation of thought and when a thought is generated, it changes the society and consequently creates a new order in it.

The relations between Shura and similar notions in western thought in the last century is one of the controversial issues Islamic political thought. Therefore this article intends to examine and analyze the relationship between shura and democracy. Because democracy in Iran begins with shura, in this article the question of application and contradiction of democracy and shura is considered and analyzed. The outcome of analyses shows that contemporary shia ulama has considered shura and democracy two things from two different sources. In spite of this, they believe that shura has the capacity of bringing about democracy in Islamic world.