جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « Al-Mizan » در نشریات گروه « علوم سیاسی »

In order to identify and explain the basis of the social life of al-Mizan and Faizal, this research has used the comparative method, content analysis, and logical analysis, and by using documentary and library information, to answer the question of whether a person after weighing the expediency of social life has chosen the social life or the structure Has his existence led him to this life?, he answered. Al-Mizan discusses this on two levels; The principle of sociality of life and human employment and heterogeneity in social life. These two issues are actually two sources and bases for the formation of social life in Al-Mizan's view, which are located at the same length. The view of the shadows is more different in this regard. Because he has linked this issue to family and nature and considered them as the main source of social life. In family takaful, Faizalal of the opinion that the family is the first brick of the social building. The family itself is based on fixed foundations in human nature and on affection, friendship, mercy, requirements and building materials. Al-Mizan to three types of people; natural savagery, moderation in natural savagery; To some extent, he has mentioned a type of mutual employment and those who turn to social life to ensure their intellectual perfection and innate purposes, and he considers the family as one of the important and primary elements of the social group and commitment, moderation, unity, consultation, harmony. and cooperation are .

Tafsir Al-Mizan and Fei-Zhal have explained social phenomena realistically with a new approach in the last century. These two interpretations have interpreted the verses of the Holy Qur'an with a rational and revealed basis, and in addition to other interpretation approaches, they have benefited from the characteristic and critical approach towards the existing social system. The main issue of this article is "similarities and differences of critical methodology in scales and shadows". This article has shown with a library and descriptive analytical and comparative method that al-Mizan and Faizal have criticized the existing human societies for turning their backs on the revealed source of knowledge and using only theoretical wisdom and relying on materialism. The distinguishing aspect of critical methodology in these two interpretations is the division of Islamic societies into (Jahili and Islamic) while Al-Mizan did not express this division while criticizing. Just as Fai-Thal has criticized Islamic societies on three grounds (nationalist, nationalist, and relations with the West), while Al-Mizan based his criticism of Islamic societies on (Westernism, ignoring revealed laws, lack of internal cohesion). and obeying corrupt rulers). In criticizing western societies and culture, he has considered and criticized factors such as (gender pleasure, lack of humanity, lack of spiritual freedom, body freedom, racism, arrogance and boasting, etc.) as effective. Al-Mizan criticizes Western society and its civilization because of the materialistic approach to existence and limiting the world to external and material levels, class distance, sensualism, instrumental rationality, the closed door of charity and the open door of hypocrisy and the lack of truth and virtue. ) has criticized. Keywords: critical methodology, Islamic societies, Western societies and civilizations, al-Mizan and Faizal

The phenomenon of hypocrisy is basically defined in the face of the rule of believers. Just as the suppression of the believers has been a tool of oppression against oppressive governments, the hypocrisy of the believers and Muslims and the exercise of political power by the non-believers are driven by non-believers who do not believe in Islam. Or have poor faith. Therefore, the issue of hypocrisy is inherently a political phenomenon that has always been the issue of Islamic societies. The main purpose of this study is to make a comparative study of the behavior of hypocrites from the perspective of contemporary commentators. The method used in this research is a qualitative content analysis of directional type. The technique and method of collecting information is the library. The main question of this research is that according to the views of contemporary commentators, what are the characteristics and components of the vision, tendency, and political behavior of the hypocrites in the Qur'an? Based on the three models of this research hypothesis, it is as follows: The views of contemporary commentators on the political behavior of hypocrites have commonalities and differences. The findings and results of this research show that the hypocrites have an uncoordinated and unbalanced position in terms of vision, inclination, and behavior against the call of divine truth and religion.