جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « Ayatollah Motahari » در نشریات گروه « علوم سیاسی »

The model of democracy was established in Iran as one of the most creative models of political systems after the 1979 revolution. The process of establishment and continuation of this model of governance is different from the model of liberal democracy and in the opposite direction to the universal trend of secularism and the explanation of its various dimensions needs research. In this research, from the thought of Ayatollah Motahhari, who was the chairman of the Revolutionary Council and its ideologue, the indicators of the model of religious democracy and their internal relationship are obtained by analytical-descriptive method and the use of library resources and works. According to the results of this study, belief in the political authority of religion and the position of the people in politics provides the basis for the establishment of a religious democracy system, with the establishment of this system and observance of the law, political equality and freedom; The nation and the government will move towards the implementation of justice and independence, and as a result, more turn to religion and a stronger presence of the people, and this situation will create the cycle of establishing and consolidating the religious democracy system.

The foreign policy of states is rooted in geography, culture, history, ideology, and the way of thinking of their leaders and founders. In Iran, Ayatollah Khomeini, Morteza Motahari, and Seyed Mohammad Beheshti are mentioned as the architects of the Islamic Revolution. The research question is, what are the characteristics of the ideal foreign policy of the Islamic state according to Ayatollah Motahari? The research hypothesis is based on the point that in the views of Martyr Morteza Motahari an Ideal foreign policy root in the principles of Islam and revolution to transcend Islam in the world. We used the descriptive-analytical method to answer the question. The findings of the research showed that in Ayatollah Motahari's political thoughts, power is defined in the context of principles of morality, and the foreign policy of an Islamic government should pursue both national interests and universal values of Islam, especially the anti-arrogance and support for the oppressed. In addition, it should simultaneously attempt to fulfill the human values in the international system. According to Ayatollah Motahari's political thoughts, the Ideal model of foreign policy for Iran is utopianism. In this model, although ideology acts as a leading structure; according to the principle of national interests and the adaptability to requirements of the time and place, it is possible to change the foreign policy.

In this article, using Foucault's political rationality approach and examining the works related to Foucault's political rationality and examining some cases of religious reform, as well as comparing the elements of classical political philosophy and modern political philosophy to identify the three political rationalities "Emirate", "Old Shepherd". The "new shepherd" and their characteristics have been identified, separated and classified, so the necessary criteria for identifying the political rationality of Ayatollah Motahhari and Akhundzadeh have been obtained. In this study, the researcher seeks to answer some basic principles and important questions: "1. What was the political rationality of Ayatollah Motahhari? 2. What was the political rationality of Akhundzadeh? 3- What similarities and differences can be Recognize the political rationality between the two? The results show that Ayatollah Motahari sought a compromise between religion and politics and believed that the two were inseparable, but Akhundzadeh, influenced by humanism, religious reform in Western Christianity and modern Western philosophy. , Believed that religion is the ancestor of politics and according to political thought in the West, believes that religion should not interfere in government.One of the most important concepts that can explain the different intellectual angles of Ayatollah Motahhari and Akhundzadeh is Foucault's political rationality The answer to these three questions seems to have a significant impact on our historical consciousness.

One of the fundamentals in naturalization and generation of Islamic humanistic science is redefining these concepts. In this regard, our understanding of society and politics and their relation in political sociology would affect in defining and positioning parties as an intermediary organism in society-government relation.
Islamic politics and sociology are presumable notions in intellectual nitty-gritties of Iran’s Islamic republic supreme leaders and its grounders. These notions can clarify concepts like political society, and parties’ role and position in the society.Based on this:we will explain The IMAM KHOMEINI'S APPROACH(leader and founder of the Islamicof the Islamic Republic of Iran )and Ayatollah Khamenei the leader of Islamic Republic of Iran and Ayatollah Morteza Motahari, about the role of parties in hslamic government.
In this approach, parties’ role would be marked as effective social organisms in political socialization in society guidance, based on Individual and community Simultaneous Theory (Collectivist and Individualistic Community Orientation) and with rejection of rule-governed society as government’s goals.
Then the difference between western and Islamic approaches based on Iranian supreme leaders’ view on parties is clarified.
society guidance, based on Individual and community Simultaneous Theory (Collectivist and Individualistic Community Orientation) and with rejection of rule-governed society as government’s goals.
Then the difference between western and Islamic approaches based on Iranian supreme leaders’ view on parties is clarified.
society guidance, based on Individual and community Simultaneous Theory (Collectivist and Individualistic Community Orientation) and with rejection of rule-governed society as government’s goals.
Then the difference between western and Islamic approaches based on Iranian supreme leaders’ view on parties is clarified.
society guidance, based on Individual and community Simultaneous Theory (Collectivist and Individualistic Community Orientation) and with rejection of rule-governed society as government’s goals.
Then the difference between western and Islamic approaches based on Iranian supreme leaders’ view on parties is clarified.