جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "سرمایه اجتماعی درون گروهی" در نشریات گروه "علوم اجتماعی"

The city of Parsabad, one of the provinces of Ardabil province, has a high level of conflict and conflicts due to its traditional, ethnic and social capital. The city of Parsabad is a society with a collective-traditional structure and witnesses many tribal-Ili conflict. The purpose of this research is to study about the occurrence of tribal-Ili conflict and the factors affecting it. The research method is quantitative-survey and its tool is researcher-made and standard questionnaire, random cluster sampling method and sample size equal to 384 people (according to Cochran's formula). The theoretical support of the research is the theory of collectivism (group limiting social capital). The results show that the level of tendency towards tribal-Ili conflict among men (13.69) compared to women; Single people (13.70) compared to the married group, age group 18 to 30 years (14.18) compared to age groups over 30 years old, illiterate and elementary school people (13.95) compared to other educational groups, occupational group Unemployed (14/20) and livestock farmer (14/05) compared to the student, agricultural and government job group, the lower class group (13/71) compared to the upper and middle class and finally the rural residents (13/98) compared to Urban residents are more. Inferential results show that between intragroup trust (0.341); intragroup cohesion (0.209); social power inequality (0.171); belonging to the tribe-Ili (0.450); social prejudice (0.382); Dag Nang Ili (0.118); relative deprivation (0.390); Imagining charity (0.226); The level of social class (-0.238) had a significant relationship with the tribal conflict. In total, the multiple correlation coefficient is equal to 0.289 and the overall explanation coefficient is equal to 0.263.

Elite political culture plays an important role in political development or underdevelopment, as can be acknowledged; the development of political culture is a necessary condition for political development, and the political development of societies is always measured by political culture. On the other hand; Attitudes and worldviews of elite political culture, if democratic, will lead to economic and social development, In the meantime, factors are influential in determining this type of political culture, the most important of which is social capital within the group. This article examines the relationship between intra-group social capital and political culture in a quantitative and survey manner. The sampling method was simple random sampling method and 214 political elites of Khuzestan province were selected as the sample. To assess political culture, Tessler standard questionnaire and researcher-made social capital questionnaire within the group were used. The results showed that the amount of social capital within the group was somewhat high (18.44) but the average political culture was moderate (19.154). The results also showed that there is a positive and significant relationship between the dimensions of social capital (trust, cohesion and intra-group participation) with political culture. And more than 19% of the variance of the political culture variable was explained by the two variables of intra-group trust and intra-group participation. In general, it can be said that social capital within a group can cause changes in the political culture of society.

Social capital has positive and negative consequences as social relations, trust and norms. The quantity and quality of relationships in a society play a central role in the type and consequence of social capital. The social capital in Iran more intra-group. Does such social capital play a role in reproducing social inequality? The research method was qualitative and data gathering was done through in-depth interviews with 12 people in the second half of 2017 in Sanandaj. The analysis of the findings has resulted in the extraction of a paradigm model with three main categories: social relations context, intergroup capital (core category) and social inequality. The results showed that many relatives, traditional family relationships and the rituals associated with it were causal conditions that led to intra-group social capital. Using Strategies such as ethnocentrism, nepotism and relationships rather than rules by actors with the underlying economic, political and cultural society and confounding factors such as bureaucracy and lack of supervision led to consequences such as favoritism, nepotism and variation in the distribution of resources All of which points to the reproduction of social inequality in society. It is therefore necessary to consider intra- group social capital in the analysis of social inequality as well as in the distribution of public resources.