جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "securitization" در نشریات گروه "علوم اجتماعی"

Cyberspace has high capacities to affect and challenge security and canimpress all national power parameters. In the social dimension, increasing useof cyberspace by people has caused social security to face challenge and getdifficult. In general, various factors affect the formation and development ofinternal security which in today’s world, in case the impacts of cyberspace inthis domain is not completely considered, they are definitely the very importantimpacts in maintaining and damaging the internal security. Crises resultingfrom cyberspace in recent years, like riots in January 1396, December 1398and the recent case in September 1401, indicate the importance and impactof cyberspace and its functions in securitization of social crises and causingserious threats in the fields of internal security.In this research which is conducted using data-based and the capacities ofthe State’s experts in the fields of strategic management of cuberspace andinternal security, while studying the nature of social phanamena resultingfrom cyberspace in national and international arena is addressed and necessarycourses of action to prevent the securitization of phenomena in cyberspace arepresented.

Corruption, as one of the main threats to the security and prosperity of countries, has attracted the attention of thinkers and policy makers for years. The Islamic Republic of Iran is not an exception to this rule, especially since this phenomenon has become one of the main threats to the country in recent years. Political corruption, as the most sensitive type of corruption in Iran, while affecting security in various dimensions and reducing public trust, is combined with the fact that its impact is often not well understood. As a result, political corruption in Iran needs more than new laws and institutions to fight it, it needs to find the root of the reasons for survival and failure to fight it. The purpose of this research is to present a model as a strategy for the success of the fight against corruption while investigating the cause of this failure in the fight against political corruption. Therefore, the central question of this research is; What factors in Iran have led to the ineffectiveness of the fight against political corruption, and what is the successful strategy for this fight? The findings of the research based on the descriptive-analytical method indicate that considering political corruption as a normal problem without an existential threat has led to the ineffectiveness of the approaches to combat it, and therefore securitization is the effective and real way to successfully combat it.

The successful launch of the Noor satellite into space (April 2020) was met with a strong response from the United States and some of its allies to Iran's violation of legal rules and international standards. However, the Islamic Republic of Iran has always stated that the development of its space program is based on the norms of international law and within the framework of conventions and treaties related to space law and has legal and international legitimacy; For this reason, it will continue to develop and expand its space program. This article examines the legitimacy of Iran's space program from the perspective of international rules, law, and standards, and argues that the main purpose of the United States is to threaten Iran's space program within the framework of a strategy of maximum pressure to build an international consensus against Iran. Research findings show that the United States is focusing on part of Iran's space program, which is dedicated to the technology of transmitting and sending satellites into space, seeks to portray Iran's actions in field of Satellite Launch Vehicle(SLV) as a cover for the development of intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) carrying nuclear warheads, and thus to represent Iran's space program as a threat to international peace and security. The two main pillars of this US strategy focus on Iran's long-range SLV capability (aimed at representing it as intercontinental ballistic missiles) and its ability to carry satellite or cargo by SLV (aimed at representing it as ballistic missiles carrying nuclear warheads).

The policy of confrontation between the Zionist regime and the Islamic Republic of Iran has always been pursued by both sides. However, in explaining the mutual strategies of the two sides, regardless of the historical course and conditions of each period, overgeneralization and even slogan dimensions have been given priority. Considering the necessity of a comprehensive cognizance of the strategies of this regime, especially considering the course of developments in the foreign arena such as JCPOA and the importance of using the strengths and weaknesses of these strategies in the foreign policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran, this paper raises the question of what strategy or strategies the Zionist regime has adopted against the Islamic Republic of Iran since the inception of the revolution, and in return, what strategies has Iran followed? The hypothesis of the paper is that the Zionist regime has so far pursued its policies in the form of four strategies, ranging from efforts to seek cooperation to active militancy. The Islamic Republic of Iran, on the other hand, has adopted two specific strategies to counter this regime.

Journaists as basic elements of print media can exert great effects on different social, cultural, and political areas. Many of such effects have been investigated in lots of researches. Nevertheles, the vital role of journalists HAS been somehow degraded in certain theoretical and pragmatic aspects especially in political sciences. One of these aspects is the role of journalists in the process of securitization. The present study tries to contribute to the understanding of the "role of journalists in threatening or empowering the national security" by investigating the role of journalists in the process of securitizing a public subject or in securitizing a security subject.