جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "transformation in humanities" در نشریات گروه "علوم اجتماعی"

Human sciences have a vital role for society and its progress. Accordingly, the purpose of this study was to design a process model for the transformation and promotion of humanities in the university from the perspective of the Supreme Leader. The approach of qualitative research and its method was grounded theory. The study data were collected and analyzed from 34 speeches of the Supreme Leader among students, elites, researchers, scholars and professors of the seminary and universities from 1979 to 1997, which are available on his dedicated website. The method of data analysis was coding and categorization, which was done in three stages of open, axial and selective coding. To ensure the validity of the research, strategies of peer review, participatory and researcher reflectivity were used. The results showed that the "core category" includes the "localization and Islamization of the humanities." Also, the most important "causal conditions" included: self-confidence and redoubled effort, learning without imitating Western science and avoiding being a student, support and investment, needs assessment and careful planning of humanities, and criticism, liberalism, and theorizing. In addition, "contextual conditions" included the nature of the humanities, the status of the humanities, appropriate acceleration, the competence of individuals to bring about change, and "environmental conditions" included Western worldview, Islamic worldview, and Western stoning. . "Strategies" also included balancing the export and import of science. The "consequences" represented social reform, Islamic civilization, and the discourse of science production.

The evolution of human knowledge is not only a discussion related to social contexts after the Islamic Revolution, but also in all civilizational interactions between the West and the East and, more importantly, scientific interactions between believers and scientists throughout history. The subject of the present article is that different approaches in the sociology of knowledge and philosophy of science have spoken about the possibility of change in knowledge, the link between faith and knowledge, the position of reason and revelation, ways of acquiring and producing knowledge. , Sought to project knowledge committed to non-Western and Islamic presuppositions and always accused of claiming science management from an unscientific and even political point of view. The purpose of this article is to critically re-examine the issues of the evolution of human knowledge, to examine the possibility of such a change in knowledge. The method used in this article is a theoretical approach and qualitative content analysis with a critical approach. The results indicate that the change in human knowledge has different meanings that have been explored in the critical study of the views of believers and critics and the theoretical and practical possibility of this change to the historical and social contexts of science and religion and the performance of the revolutionary movement in Iran Has been criticized.

The quantity and quality of creation of knowledge prepares the grounds for a fundamental change and sustainable and balanced development in every society. The present paper aims to analyze the perception of the university elites and scholars about the obstacles in the way of creation of knowledge in humanities. To this end, by employing the capacity of qualitative methods and phenomenological approach, the subject under study has been identified and its depth represented. The data was collected through targeted sampling (chain-referral method) and semi-structured in-depth interview with 27 elites and professors of the University of Tehran and analyzed based on Colaizzi seven-step method. The analysis of the data culminated in the identification of seven main themes: The cultural and social obstacles; economic obstacles; communication obstacles; individual obstacles; obstacles related to facilities; and, obstacles related to policymaking and planning. The domination of the advocates of quantitative approach over the educational and research decision-making processes has created serious challenges in the way of the formation of the discourse of creation of local or indigenous knowledge and moving towards the realization of scientific authority. While moving towards the institutionalization of the discourse of transformation, it is pertinent to put the following measures on the agenda: Replacing centralization and extreme emphasis on the production and number of research articles with the trends of creation of knowledge and value; revising and readdressing the policies; and consequently preparing a comprehensive action plan.