جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « خطبه غدیر » در نشریات گروه « علوم قرآن و حدیث »

The Ghadir event is one of the most important events in the history of Islam and the last general assembly of the Messenger of Allah to introduce his successor in the form of Imamate. The importance of this incident and the status of Wilāyat and Imamate in the Islamic society have prompted many poets, including Persian poets, to introduce and explain this important event in their poems. Kasayi Marvzi, a poet of the 4th century AH, is also one of the Persian-speaking Shia poets who wrote poems using the theme, style, and vocabulary of Ghadir's sermon, and they can be analyzed through intertextual relationships. Intertextuality is a theory that examines the relationships and interactions between texts. According to this theory, each text gives meaning based on the texts that have been read before. The present research, with a descriptive and analytical method, has sought to answer the question, what is the analysis of the intertextual relations of "understanding and grace" in the sermon of Ghadir and Ghadiriyah of Kasayi Marvzi? The results of the research show that the presence and mastery of words and terms in the conceptual field of grace and understanding and the frequency of using and connecting these two words and concepts show their importance in both present and absent texts.

Ghadīr-e Khumm as an important historical Islamic fact has been a turning point in the explanation of the Imamate and the continuation of the Islamic movement. The holy prophet Muhammad (pbuh), according to divine order, traced the inseparable correlation between Imamate and the governance and administration of worldly affairs, stating that the criterion of truth is the divine path of God in the form of infallible Imams, and this will continue until the end of Time and the appearance of Imam Mahdi (pbuh) Therefore, according to Ghadīr’s texts including Ghadir’s sermon and Ghadīriyah Ziyārat, deviant ideas such as secularism, pluralism, different interpretations from religion, tolerance in making relation to enemies and opponents, and misconceptions of Khātamiyyat (termination of Prophethood) and Mahdism will be invalidated.

The term «مولی» (which roughly translates to the custodian or the guardian) is the basis of Ghadir sermon, considered as the most significant rhetorical proof of Shias to validate the rightousness of Imam Ali as the successor of prophet and the sole Imam for the Muslims after the demise of prophet. Understanding this concept centers on some fundamental factors namely literary analysis, meaning analysis, discourse markers and textual elements. The intra-textual proofs have a significant role in understanding the concept of «مولی», but earlier researchers have hardly ever paid due attention to these factors. One of the indicators signifying the concept of «مولی» as the custodianship of Imam Ali is «ا لست اولی بکم من انفسکم». This phrase is revealed upon the attendants in Ghadir speech prior to the usage of «من کنت مولاه فعلی مولاه». This precedence is taken as a proof that the term refers to custodianship and guardianship , henceforth giving weight to the rightousness of Imam Ali as the successor of the holy peophet. Some prejudiced contemporary authors have undermined the valued of this significant textual element, casting doubt on its importance. In the present study, this textual element assumes a double significance. The current study aims to investigate the status of precedence as a proof of legitimacy of the narrative, continuation of the first condition for the establishement of precedence, that is, the multiplicity of narrators at all levels. The views expressed by Sunni hadith scholars vis-à-vis the phrase «ا لست اولی بکم من انفسکم» have been considered in depth in this research. Proving the existance of eighteen companions in the first level of narration and dozens of others in other levels nullifies the possibility of any distortion or forgery in the authenticity of this narrative. Also, from the viewpoint of both Sunni and Shia scholars, it is submitted that while using this methodology, the need to examine the document and establish the authenticity of narrators is obliterated. Hence, the present study establishes that according to Sunni resources through the application of textual-precedence principle both Sunni and Shia Scholars reach a consensus on the authenticity of such a section within Ghadir speech.

Jihadi administrations inspired by the Islamic faith and the belief in the principle of “we can” that the great Imam has taught us all, led Iran to glory and progress in all areas, is one of the turning points of the declaration of the second step. Ghadir Sermon is the most important sermon of the Prophet (PBUH) in representing the succession of Islam and the supreme example of Islamic management in the conduct of the Holy Prophet, which is important for extracting patterns and intellectual frameworks in the administration of contemporary Islamic society; Especially since many theories of public administration and human resource management are derived from Western sources and in terms of epistemological and anthropological foundations, do not correspond much with the Islamic approach. The purpose of this article is to explain and interpret the model extracted from the conduct of the Holy Prophet for educating successor as a model of Islamic succession by maintaining general steps and concepts to adapt to the temporal, spatial and social conditions for training managers in different organizations, institutions and centers. Also, this model can be used as a criterion in managerial and religious issues to analyze and interpret the historical events of early Islam, such as the formation of religious sects, political crises, social discontent, and so on.

Ghadir's sermon was one of the most important speeches of the Prophet (peace be upon him), spoken by a large Muslim population in the year 10 A.H, and contains important messages about Islam and its main pillars, such as Imamate and Velayat. To examine this sermon, which is reported in three different quotes, and to obtain the full content of the Prophet's training, it is necessary to use text-based and credible interdisciplinary research methods to accurately parse texts and draw a general pattern of the text. In this paper, we attempt to analyze each of the three texts reported as a sermon separately, using the content analysis method, and then draw a geometric structure of each of these texts using the "content analysis" technique. Research findings show that these three reports, despite slight differences, share many similarities with each other and emphasize specific and consistent themes and categories. The results of the research provide the capability to integrate the geometrical structure of these three sermons. Therefore, the authenticity and validity of all three sermons are proven.

Speech act proposed by Austin and Searle is a groundbreaking theory in pragmatics. This theory shows how language is used to do things or perform acts. It looks at language use in contexts and seeks to reveal implied meanings and implicatures, enabling scholars to provide a more comprehensive and thorough analysis of texts. According to speech act theory, human beings do not just employ words and grammatical structures of language to convey meanings to each other, they perform certain acts through speech. The current study aims to explore and analyze the speech acts present in Ghadir Hadith according to the speech act theory. The findings show that multiple speech acts are tapped on to convey the main message of Ghadir speech made by the holy prophet. In declarative speech acts, after the successful employment of declarative verb, a new situation emerges and Imam Ali is appinted as the successor of the holy prophet. Also, in directive speech acts, the addressee is requested to shoulder his divine responsibilities vis-à-vis the rightousness of Imam Ali as the successor of Holy Prophet. In representative/assertive acts, the actual reality about succession of prophet is made manifest in the speech of prophet and attempt is made to exhibit its rightness. In commissive acts, the prophet sees himself committed to convey the divine decree about Imam Ali’s succession. In expressive acts, prophet portrays the elevated status of Imam Ali and conveys his emotions by the use of expressive domains of language and expressive speech acts. Withdueregard to situational/contextual factors and speech acts used in Ghadir hadith, the addresser sought to introduce his successor by directing the addressees, asserting his virtues and reminding the addressees of his noble qualities. The addresser in Ghadir hadith sought to share his line of reasoning and thoughts with the addressees and call upon them to swear allegiance to Imam Ali. The current paper concludes that through gaining metalinguistic awareness of elements in Ghadir speech and by tapping on the functions of language, Muslims can gain a deeper understaning of the hidden semantic layers and unveil the shrouds about subtle facts.

The sermon of Ghadir as one of the most important and last words of the Prophet contains important messages and its study is necessary to become familiar with the nature of the Islamic religion and its main pillars. Nevertheless, the historical narration of this sermon in three different volumes, as well as differences in some of their themes and expressions, has necessitated the analysis and review of the content of these texts. In this research, we tried to use the interdisciplinary and novel research methods, first, each of the three texts reported as Ghadir's sermon was analyzed separately, secondly, by comparing the three texts, the degree of similarities and differentiations and layers of consonant and inconsistent determination And, thirdly, by providing quantitative and qualitative analyzes, the necessary preconditions for criticizing the content of this sermon, as well as entering into discourse analyzes, to identify the production time of each of the three sermons and the historical context of their publication. For this reason, using the method of "content analysis" as one of the methods for analyzing the text, in the first step, with the technique of "thematic analysis", each of the sermons as an independent text, was accurately and deeply identified and analyzed in step The second is using comparative comparisons of these texts with the help of the method of "thematic deep structural search" and we have identified consonant and incompatible layers.

The speeches of the prophet who is the exegete and determiner of the word of God are the most precious source for guidance and human training after the noble Quran. In Real, one of the parameters of the prophet’s traditions is reasoning from the Quran verses and applying the Quranic terms. One of this tradition is Khotbeh Ghadir (Ghadir Sermon) which can be seen 50 Quranic evidences explicitly and Implicitly. This research aims to study this issue and the methods of impressionability of Khotbeh Ghadir (Ghadir Sermon) from the noble Quran and to show the harmony between the prophet’s speeches and the Noble Quran. It should be mentioned that in this note instead of the content of the Noble Quran word and Khotbeh Ghadir, it is emphasized on the style and how to state the issue.