جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "رهیافت تفسیری" در نشریات گروه "علوم قرآن و حدیث"

Verse 140 of Surah Al-Imran, known as the verse of alternation, as well as some other related verses, including verse 104 of Surah An-Nisa ', refer to the issue of the vicissitudes of life and the tradition of evolution. Analysis and evaluation of various interpretive approaches, including pure, esoteric and diligent narration of the following verses, shows how the interpreter's approach and his use of interpretive data can lead to multiple understandings and sometimes disagreement. Based on the findings of this study, it can be said that the differences in interpretive approaches under the verses related to alternation, which are typically influenced by the interpreter's approach and how he cites interpretive data, lead to differences in understanding issues such as descent and descent space, meaning of words, the connection between verse 140 of Al-Imran and verse 104 of Nisa and also the difference in the interpretation of terms that deal with Islamic theology and beliefs in some way.

Choosing pronoun reference in part of the 190th verse of surah e A'raf “They ascribe partners to Him concerning that which He has given them” causes challenges among interpreters of both sects: referring pronoun of the verb "جعلا" to Adam and Eve how will compatible with infallibility of Adam(PBUH). Many narrative texts are showing these challenges tracking back to Islamic first centuries. Both sects' interpreters chose different approaches for explanation of this verse. Theories like Polytheism of Adam and Eve (PBUH), Polytheism of Quraysh ancestors, Polytheism of human kind are seen among exegesis approaches of both sects. This article by critics and analysis of exegesis approaches has chosen the theory of Polytheism of Adam and Eve (PBUH) as selected approach . According to similar verses and interpretive narrations and rational reasons, Quranic and narrative of infallibility of Adam (PBUH), it seems that the verse is seeking to explain the story of childbearing of Adam and Eve, but in the part of “جعلا له شرکاء" pointed to end of Polytheist children of these two

Verses 74 and 80 of Surah al-Kahf are among verses which in a superficial inspection are not compatible with some principles of belief and theology in Islam. Giving the command to murder Gholam before his crime is proved and justifying that by some evidences such as awareness of his heresy in future or fear and reluctance of the incoming heresy are some of the most basic apparent drawbacks in these verses. Some commentators have attempted to make use of narrative, literary, juristic, theological, and mystical approaches to solve this problem. Making a reference to historical and rational evidences, they have presented some analyses of this event and in this regard, they have often been influenced by the exegetical movements relying on those evidences. Using descriptive analysis, the present study aims to discover each of the abovementioned approaches, then determine and evaluate their underlying viewpoints and finally explore the effect of various exegetical schools on the Sunni and Shi’ite commentators’ views during the history of Qur’anic exegesis. It seems that using the theological approach, especially belief in the divine wisdom, has been more effective that other alternatives as it is compatible with foundations and ancillaries of faith as well as the rest of approaches.
Received: 9/5/2018   |   Accepted: 19/12/2018

The present paper is the first to deal with the two issues of history and the categorization of the study of Islamic political philosophy in the West. The first part of the paper deals with the emergence and historical development of the study of Western scholars on Islamic political philosophy and, in addition to giving an account of the life of these scholars, introduces the most important works written in the West about Islamic political philosophy. In the second part, the study of the Islamic political philosophy in the West is categorized into four approaches: historical, interpretive, critical, and descriptive. The above categorization is not based on time, but on the congruence of content. In addition, arriving at the above approach for categorization was not based on an deductive criterion, but on the inductive study of the works written about the Islamic political philosophy in the West.