جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « سیاق » در نشریات گروه « علوم قرآن و حدیث »

Some commentators have referred to verse 172 of Surah Al-Araf for the existence of the universe. But some consider the meaning of the words and the appearance of the verse to be against this claim. The current research is descriptive-analytical with the aim of finding the correct translation and in accordance with the contextual evidence to find an answer to the question that what is the most appropriate translation Based on this, by putting the apparent meaning of the words of the verse as the principle, he explained the coherence and connection of the verses of Surah A'raf and came to the conclusion that the main focus of this surah is a call to obey the Holy Quran and a warning to those who oppose this call, and for this purpose, He states the consequences of denying the call of truth from Hazrat Adam to the last prophet and reaches a conclusion in verse 172 and says: (We created the children of Hazrat Adam generation after generation and made them witnesses We decided on our own: Am I not your God? And they said yes, we testify. This confession is for the sake of not saying on the Day of Judgment that we were ignorant of it). This translation does not refer to the subterranean world, nor to the natural call; Rather, it is an intellectual confession that was formed based on the observations of the verses and visions of the divine prophets.

 The aim of this study is the part of Siyaq in content analysis of otherworldly Ezaieyeh five Surahs (Al-Waqi’ah, At-Takwir, Al-Infitar, Al-Inshiqaq- Az-Zalzalah) which is arranged to learn more about understanding the verses, divine warnings in the verses of these Surahs in the matter of the resurrection, and the judgement day.The overview, In terms of content of these Surahs, defines all of them have similarity and common structure in the first verse with conditional Eza, mention of definitive condition answer, concept coincidence of some shared words, and the meaning and aim of each Surah, containing of belong description of Eza, condition answer of the Surahs, and in terms of subject.The part of Siyaq, considering the content signification of words, and special paraphrase of verses, generally is included the threat of Doomsday denier which is mentioned as threat, and emphasis and use of special paraphrases, questions, proper oaths with strong reasons, to emerge the important aim of Surahs revelation, which is divine guidance in proof of Doomsday, and returning of deniers to Almighty God, and punishment notice

The method of adaptation is always one of the most effective methods in obtaining the truth in most subjects. In the present era, the book of Tafsir Al-Rahman Al-Rahman and Al-Mizan is one of the great interpretations of our era, which in general view the method of ijtihad of the Qur'an to the Qur'an is a characteristic of both interpretations.After explaining the general structure of these two interpretations and referring to the characteristics of each in the position of comparison and application of the method of the Qur'an to the Qur'an, the present article explains the vocabulary and the important issue of the context in both interpretations. The detailed, comprehensive and extensive explanation of the meaning of words is one of the key components of the interpretation of blessings, which truly has a new style. As dealing with the issue of context as a noble innovation is one of the very important characteristics of al-Mizan's interpretation, and finally, it must be admitted that the use of both interpretations can lead us to a deep and comprehensive understanding of the Qur'an, which is the art of this article.

he chapters of the Quran are composed of interconnected and cohesive verses, and this cohesion stems from the various types of relationships between them, including lexical, syntactic, and logical connections. Coherence refers to the intra-textual mechanism of language that assists the speaker in creating and maintaining communication within each sentence or between sentences; in other words, coherence refers to the structural-lexical relations of the text. Therefore, in this research, first, the perspective of the most prominent interpreters regarding the Meccan and Medinan nature of this chapter is analyzed. Specifically, three interpretations written in the order of revelation are examined in detail, along with the interpreters' views on the Meccan or Medinan nature of Surah Al-Muzzammil and how the sections of this chapter relate to each other, as well as the effectiveness of the interpretations in dealing with exceptional verses and the possibility that the textual coherence between chapters as a possible evidence of the chapter as being entirely Meccan is speculated. Furthermore, considering the linguistic role and the theory of textual coherence in relation to the context and structure, the factors of structural and textual coherence in Surah Al-Muzzammil are investigated, and finally, examples and relevant instances are presented in two tables.

Context is one of the most important signs in understanding the divine meaning, which is considered one of the main tools of the interpreter in structuralist interpretations. Considering the importance of Saeed Hawwā's Tafsir al-Asās among these interpretations, it is necessary to count the number of times the context is used under each function, and its interpretations are also criticized so that the interpreter's precision has been revealed in using the context in solving interpretive disputes. The research was done with descriptive-analytical method and using library resources, based on the findings of this research, Saeed Hawwā has used from the context in 357 cases, which includes 12 functions, including the development and limitation of the meaning of words, proving the continuity of the verses, which apparently seems to be incoherent, and understanding the type of tools and etc. The multiplicity of functions means the commentator's attention to different subjects. Although Saeed Hawwā has paid attention to the many applications of context, he has not paid attention to functions such as understanding Meccan and Madani verses and surahs, discovering the descent unit, choosing readings, etc., which are among the uses of context. Also, has not paid enough attention to various contexts, and giving priority to one's own opinions and the opinions of others over them, has caused weakness in his perceptions.

The Quran represents the primary source of religion, faith, and the essence of both material and spiritual life for humanity. Understanding the meaning of its verses holds paramount importance, especially in contemporary times. The more one comprehends the concepts and translations of the Quran in the modern era, the more they benefit from its effects, blessings, and particularly, a deeper understanding. Conversely, a lack of understanding of the Quran leaves one devoid of its guidance, blessings, and impacts. From the perspective of scholars, translation plays a crucial role in comprehending and understanding the Quran. The Quran is the most comprehensive and valuable Islamic source for guiding humanity, second only to Allah. This research focuses on the role of translation in understanding the Quran based on scholars' perspectives, particularly emphasizing Imam Khamenei's viewpoint. Employing a descriptive-analytical research method, this study delves into the significance of translation in understanding the Quran, emphasizing scholars' views and Imam Khamenei's perspective. The findings highlight that "translation" encompasses attention to context, recitations, divine teachings' comprehension, and a particular focus on fundamental meanings using Quranic keywords and core concepts according to the viewpoint of Ayatollah Khamenei and a segment of Islamic scholars.

There are many interconnected conceptual networks in the Holy Qur'an, which can be uncovered with careful investigation. "Fasilah" which is located at the end of the structure of some verses has a close semantic connection with the verses that are close to each other, other verses of the Surah and especially with the contents of the same verse. The main question is that how is the semantic connection between the endings of the verses with each other and with the body of that verse? and could we categorize that connections? Quranic scholars and commentators have recounted limited aspects of this relationship, but the present research is based on the introduction of al-Mizan's effort and its innovations in explaining the relationship between intervals and the content of the verses. Al-Mizan's effort in this field, in addition to helping to interpret the verses, also reveals the wonders and expressive beauties of the Holy Quran. By extracting examples of interpretation from al-Mizan, this research has presented several types of semantic connection between intervals and the content of verses and has reflected Allameh Tabatabai's innovation in this field. Based on the results of this research, in the interpretation of al-Mizan, thirteen types of semantic connection between the distance and the content of the verse can be identified in terms of subject and four types in terms of audience, which are accompanied by numerous evidences from al-Mizan.

The Holy Qur'an is the miracle of the Prophet of Islam (PBUH), in which challenges (tahaddῑ) to it are mentioned in several verses; however, thinkers have had differences in the qualitative and quantitative aspects of this challenge. Using the descriptive-analytical method, this research, which was written in response to the question of wisdom in the difference in the content of Tahaddῑ verses, after quoting and analyzing the existing concepts, by re-reading the verses of the challenge and emphasizing the context, which is one of the most well-known means of understanding the meanings of the Qur'an, proves that challenges are as follows: in Surah Al-'Isrᾱ' the challenge has not been done while a challenge in Surah Yunus with one Surah in terms of explaining the summaries of other holy books, a challenge in Surah Hud repeating the news of the past in different styles and chapters without differences, a challenge in Surah Toor in the way of repeating the contents which not only does not cause boredom but also cause simultaneous in the hearts to tremble and the hearts of the believers to calm down, and a challenge in Surah Al-Baqarah with a surah whose contents are mutually supportive and without any contradictions, even though it was revealed gradually, also from an 'Ummῑ person (as a person who did not go to school), and finally, the challenge in Surah Al-Qasas with a book containing beliefs, rules and morals that guides people in this world and the hereafter.

 Discourse mining is one of the new methods that explore the meaning of the text and its underlying layers. One of the important verses of the Qur'an, which is a great discourse in the social arena, is verse 25 of Surah Anfal. This verse is one of the verses cited by Muslim scholars, and there have been various interpretations of the word "sedition" and its correct reading. Therefore, discourse analysis is important in examining this verse. In the present research, using the descriptive-analytical method, verse 25 of Surah Anfal was examined and analyzed by the discourse analysis method, and its main axes were determined. And it was explained that according to the context and internal and external evidence, this verse talks about an important matter such as Wilayat, and Wilayat as the central sign of this discourse indicates that the mission of the Holy Prophet of Islam (PBUH) and the religion of Islam is the flow of Wilayat. It is axis, not sharia axis. And the way to deal with temptations is to adhere to the Book of God and the Sunnah of the Prophet (PBUH).

One of the important issues in the interpretation of the Quran is to know the precise and correct meaning of the Quranic terms. Quranic vocabulary is the key words for understanding Quranic verses. Achieving the precise and comprehensive meaning of the Qur'anic verses depends on understanding its vocabulary. Exegetists have presented many different solutions to understand and correctly interpret the Qur'anic word “Dhahekat” (laughed) in the story of Prophet Abraham, but each of these solutions faces many problems. The present research, which was compiled with the aim of using the rule of context in understanding and interpreting the mentioned word, after collecting information from the available sources and using the analytical-descriptive method, came to the following conclusion By juxtaposing verses and stories in different surahs of the Qur'an, a context emerges that, as one of the methods of correct interpretation of the Qur'an, plays a fundamental and main role in understanding this word in the story of Prophet Abraham, and according to this context, the word "Dhahekat" means laughing and its cause was giving the good news of a child.

AbstractZainab Izadakhasi،Assistant Professor of Shushtar Branch of Azad University.One of the prerequisites for the interpretation of the Qur'an is to have the recitations communicated by the Prophet, considering the importance of the subject, the basis of this research is to collect the recitations in the verses of the twenty-first part of the Qur'an based on the interpretation of Tabari; Ibn Jarirtbari, author of the commentary "Jami al-Bayan an Ai al-Qur'an" has paid attention to the issue of different readings in the interpretation of the verses, what is discussed in this article is to compare these readings with the readings found in different interpretations of the Imamiyyah and the Sunnis and to understand this matter. Whether other experts confirm Tabari's preferred reading or not, and what criteria Tabari's justifications for accepting his own reading are based on. Reflecting on Tabari's interpretation brings us to the criteria and criteria for the preference of recitations according to him. The most important of these criteria are: 1. Agreeing with the script of the Mushaf; 2. agreement with Arabic literature; 3. Reader consensus; 4. Coordination of reading with the context; 5. The eloquence and eloquence of recitation; 6. Matching the reading with the narration.

Interpretive narrations following the verses of the Holy Quran clarify the meaning and application of some verses about the Imams (AS). One of the attributes mentioned in the narrations for Ahl al-Bayt (AS) is "Ahl al-Zikr" which is expressed in verses 43 of Surah An-Nahl and 7 of Surah Anbiya with completely similar phrases. What is significant in creating a difference in interpretation and determination of the examples for these verses is the apparent confrontation that has taken place between the narrations in this regard with the context of these two verses. This article, after presenting the typology and classification of the commentators' opinions and a brief review of it, presents the narrations expressing this meaning and tries to clarify the existing harmony between the narrations and the context of the verses by explaining the context of the verses of these two suras separately.

Among the emerging ideas that are not unrelated to the expansion of economic and social activities of the new age, the emergence of new ideas and interpretations about usury can be mentioned. Major efforts in this area include introducing new definitions of monetary issues, including interest rates and limiting usury to consumer or necessary loans. However, these new views and interpretations of the concepts of usury are not unlike the efforts of their predecessors on this serious issue: resorting to acceptable tricks in the Shari'a and finding exceptions to the usual economic activities. In adhering to or rejecting any of these cases, the Quranic concepts and principles of interpretation, including the context of the verses of usury along with the historical documents that indicate the type of activities of the era of the revelation of the Qur'an, should not be neglected. In this study, while examining the context and general atmosphere of the verses related to usury (a collection of verses that probably have a common semantic space), More is mentioned in the inner context of the verse; As a result of such a view, examining the verses of usury together (rather than the verses before and after in a surah) can answer many contemporary theories and practices in financial systems, including the banking industry.

Undoubtedly, the science of recitation has a direct impact on the interpretation of the Holy Qur'an, and commentators have interpreted it based on recitations. As some commentators, facing different recitation, have settled on the common recitation, and some have chosen a specific recitation and interpreted based on it. And some have read all the recitation. Allameh Tabataba'i has chosen the method of criticism and selection of readings by assuming the non-frequency of recitations and taking into account the criteria of correct recitation in the science of recitation, which is the authenticity of the document of the narration of the recitation, its conformity with the Arabic rules and the script of the Mushaf. And in addition to the correct reading criteria, he has put forward some criteria for choosing the recitation. He criticizes some of the readings according to his desired criteria in facing different readings and prefers and selects some of the readings with reasoning, having the conditions of acceptance of the reading, conformity of the reading with the context of the verse or by means of narrative evidence. In some cases, he cites the reading in support of his interpretative point of view. However, in some cases he prefers a reading without mentioning the reason, and in some cases he states different readings and leaves them unexamined without preferring any of the readings. This article has analyzed and criticized Allameh Tabataba'i's view on correct reading with an analytical method.

Among the books of Quranic readings and Quranic sciences and exegesis, there are different indicators to determine the preference of popular readings over each other; indicators that the scholars of this field have always used in reasoning throughout the history of this science. One of the most important indicators is that the readings are inArabic. Adhering to the common laws of Arabic usage and syntax, eloquence and rhetoric are counted as some of the criteria for deciding Arabicness.When counting the aspects of the preference of readings over the Hafs Reading, the aspect that is most statistically preferred is the one related to literary preference based on indisputable Arabic laws, in the sense that in numerous instances, another reading in terms of Arabicness is preferred over the Haf reading. Similarly, a study of the context of verses in some instances expresses the preference of other readings over the Hafs one. These preferences have also led to differences in the exegetic views of interpreters. The focus of this article is to study these aspects of preference and analysis of some of the instances based on the views of Tabarsi and Farra in comparison to other Sunni and Shiite exegetes. Some of the results of this research include: resolving some of the problems in justifying the literary aspect of verses in exegesis considering other popular readings, explaining the semantic aspect more clearly in exegesis, the academic acceptance of both the Sunnis and Shias in this aspect, etc.

According to semantic theories, one of the best ways to understand the meaning of words, along with the use of vocabulary resources and etc., is to use the feature of contrast. The present study deals with the semantic analysis of the opposition of the words “Yamin” and “Shemal” in the Holy Quran, while in this opposition, “Yamin” is presented to “Shemal”, and in addition to the opposition, the use of the context of the preceding and following verses is also considered. . Sometimes, from the context or the meaning of the opposite word, some meanings are understood that cannot be seen in any dictionary. Besides, there is a semantic affinity between the understood meaning and the original word. Based on the findings of this research, the words yamin and north generally mean "right" and "left", but they have other secondary meanings that are related to the main meaning. Other meanings of the word Yamin are power, goodness, ownership, agreement and oath, all of which are related to the right hand. The word north, in addition to left hand and left side, conveys the meaning of weakness and (spiritual) weakness, which is related to the original meaning. But when the word ashab is added to these two words, they no longer mean directions, and this matter has been overlooked by most translators, and the meaning has not been fulfilled.

The commentators differ in the interpretation of the verse 106 of Sūrat al-Baqara - known as the abrogation verse. This verse often implies the abrogation of legal rulings or the revocation of Sharī‘a laws or the change of Muslims’ Qibla. But these cases can only be documented for the generality of the verse and will not be the direct referent of the verse. With reliance on intratextual evidences (context and verses of similar subject in other sūras), we can reach another perusal of this verse. In this research, according to the main purpose included in the context of this verse, the main concepts aligned with it are obtained. By tracking them throughout the Qur’an, it becomes clear that such concepts exist in two contexts with the same theme in Sūrat al-Nisā and al-Jum‘a. Finally, by comparing the data and analyzing them, the direct referent of the abrogation verse is obtained, which is completely different from the common views.